In the summer of 2010, "Tangshan Da**" made a stunning debut. Director Feng Xiaogang spoke as boldly at the press conference as always, predicting that the film will hit a box office of 500 million. He went out of his way to tell the audience that this is not an easy-to-entertain film, and those who are looking for entertainment should not spend money on tickets. Some reporters questioned how such reverse propaganda could ensure that the 500 million box office became a reality? Feng Xiaogang confidently said that everything he shoots has a box office, and no one can surpass his box office strength. In the end, the box office of "Tangshan Da**" received 67.3 billion.
Time has come to the end of 2023, and Feng Xiaogang is back with his new work "If You Are Honest Do Not Disturb 3". Although the publicity was vigorous, the box office of the movie had just exceeded 1 billion a month after its release. This begs the question, why are there so many zeros after the decimal point? The box office of the film only exceeded 10 million in the first three days of the film, and the box office was only hundreds of thousands per day in the second week, which is obviously a little inadequate. Feng Xiaogang used to be the box office hegemon, but this time he lost to himself. The article mentions the quality of the movie and ridicules the "rotten" nature of "If You Are Honest Do Not Disturb 3".
The article is interspersed with episodes about Feng Xiaogang's early sketch "Robot Funny Stories" and some criticisms of the movie "Non 3". Feng Xiaogang seems to have a gap in his understanding of future technological developments, portraying robots as "gentle and virtuous" and questioning the film's imagination of the future in 2034. The article raises some grievances about the characters and plot in the film, especially criticism of the actors' performance and plot development.
In the end, the article aims to reveal the reasons for the film's failure and question Feng Xiaogang's attitude, and expresses his views in ironic and humorous language. At the end, the article mentions Feng Xiaogang's "garbage audience theory" about the audience's attitude, pointing out that the actual length of the film is only 78 minutes, full of product placement, and there is no respect for the audience. Finally, the article calls on Feng Xiaogang to consider giving up some random projects, as well as his true attitude towards the audience. The whole article is a humorous and critical tone, and the film and Feng Xiaogang are cleverly deconstructed.