10,000 people support the prosecution of Mo Yan? If you don t understand literature, it s destined t

Mondo Culture Updated on 2024-02-28

Recently, a Weibo nicknamed "Mao Xinghuo of Truth-Telling" claimed to sue Nobel laureate Mo Yan for alleged worksInsult the hero, glorify the enemy, and offered to ask Mo Yan to compensate each Chinese 1 yuan, a total of$1.4 billionappeals.

The indictment and a small note about to be accepted by the judiciary have been posted on the Internet.

A screenshot of the results of its online voting was posted, showing that nearly 10,000 people supported his prosecution, and only more than 1,000 did not, to prove the correctness of his decision and the support of public opinion.

Looking through its Weibo, the condemnation with Mo Yan as the theme fills its pages, and the anger is very public. He scribbled on Mo Yan's ** page, searching for chapters and excerpts to prove his point. The language style is very similar to "Qin Huohuo" who made up facts many years ago in order to attract attention.

Qin Huohuo finally paid the price for his actions, went to prison, and lost his reputation.

Will Mao Xinghuo lift a stone to shoot himself in the foot and follow the old path of Qin Huohuo?

Probably not. But it was destined to be just a farce.

The reason is simple:Literature is art, not a simple photograph of the facts. It's the art of fiction, as long as you have a beginner level of Chinese, you will understand this principle. Using fiction to prove the details of what actually exists is ridiculous in itself.

As Mo Yan said when reviewing the writing of his ** "Song of Heavenly Garlic":

"Copying life is not literature, and there are emotions everywhere in the pen. ”

Looking at literature from a non-literary perspective, of course, there are many misunderstandings. Even if there is a so-called"Little hate"., and can't cover up the whole work"Great love".

Moreover,Taking things out of context is not the right way to find evidenceIn order to understand the ideology and value orientation of the work, it is necessary to understand and grasp it from the perspective of the work as a whole. At this point, Mao Xinghuo does not have this level.

Moreover, Mo Yan's works have been published for decades, and the latest publication of a full-length novel was also published more than ten years ago, which has already been tested by history, the people, and official institutions. Although "Breast and Fat Buttocks" once caused huge controversy, with the development of the times, the world and China have recognized this **.

Moreover, Mo Yan also won the 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature for his ** work, which is considered to be his **"Blending psychedelic realism with folk tales, history, and contemporary social realities".。The Nobel Prize in Literature is undoubtedly the most noble laurel in a literary country, recognized by the people of China and the world, and its authority is beyond doubt.

In real life, but higher than real life. The Nobel Prize for Mo Yan is well versed in this literary theory, and while his work blends history and contemporary social reality, it is psychedelic realism, a folk tale, not reportage or a news feature.

Simply linking the ** description with social facts is a low-level joke in itself, a joke that doesn't understand what literature is. Just as many people thought that "The True Story of Ah Q" was scolding themselves more than a hundred years ago, but who would sue Lu Xun? Lu Xun scolded a lot of people, who ever sued Lu Xun for compensation? Moreover, many of Lu Xun's works are not **, but also prose and essays.

In fact, these people who use the banner of "justice" to wave their flags and shout to sue celebrities know that they are all knowing: Isn't it just to get a traffic? Isn't the purpose of Bo traffic just for money? And the so-called people who support his demands are not just to package their image of justice and join in the fun?

If it is not for its own interests, but really for the sake of righteousness, for the interests of the public, then why make a big fuss? Dry it directly! If you want to report the list of high-quality authors, you should report it silently, if you want to sue, you should concentrate on prosecuting, and if you want to discuss it in detail, you will try your best to write**, and publish articles to the authority**. This is the act of sincerely fighting for justice.

I hope this kind of farce doesn't happen again, let's do something seriously.

Related Pages