The United States calls itself the "world's policeman," but its behavior is far from the role of a police officer. On the contrary, the United States often provokes disputes around the world, leading to many wars related to it. To some extent, however, the United States is really good at finding business opportunities. In the public mind, war is a very "money-burning" thing, and it is. However, in the eyes of the United States, war has become a means of enriching themselves. By provoking a war, the United States is able to sell not only to the warring parties, but also to neighboring countries to expand its sales market. However, there is a prerequisite for this to be accomplished, and that is that the United States itself cannot be involved in the war, so as to ensure maximum benefits. Today, however, the United States is far less controllable. Especially in the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the United States has shown its "very responsible" side, even at the expense of drawing itself into the quagmire of war. Recently, an expert noted in an article that another war in the Middle East is beckoning to the United States, and the opponent will be the Houthis in Yemen. This event, which triggered the war, is closely linked to the recent situation in the Red Sea. The Houthis had intended to put pressure on Israel by intercepting Israeli-linked ships in order to facilitate a ceasefire in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As a result, Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt have chosen to turn a blind eye, and the Houthis have made a name for themselves after challenging Israel's ** route. However, this operation, which was aimed at "promoting a ceasefire", unexpectedly had a serious global impact and caused huge losses to Western companies. Against this backdrop, the United States chose to intervene and sank three Houthi boats to prove that it had the courage to act and that no one would dare to question its resolve. However, the motivation of the United States to do so is puzzling. After all, the negative impact of the blockage of the Red Sea route is relatively limited compared to the possibility of involving the United States in the spread of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. So why did Biden make such a dangerous decision? This is due to the fact that the position of the United States on this issue is different from that of other Western countries. To put it simply, an early ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will do more good than harm to the United States. So what can be done to broker a ceasefire? The quickest way to do that is to put pressure on Israel. But the problem is that the United States and other Western countries are on Israel's side. As a result, the United States can only put pressure on the Houthis to demonstrate its support for Israel and try to defend its own strategic interests in the Middle East. In addition, it is worth noting that the ** who reported this article has close ties with the US Conservative Party (i.e., the Republican Party), perhaps this is to set the stage for the upcoming **. But it is undeniable that what the expert said is telling the truth, the war is very close to the United States, and it is not limited to the Middle East, the crisis in Venezuela, the crisis on the Korean Peninsula and the conflict between Russia and Ukraine are potential risks for the United States. As to whether the United States will be involved in these conflicts, and on what scale, only time will tell.
* One of the reported experts noted in an article that the United States may be on the verge of facing another potential Middle East war, and the adversary will be Yemen's Houthis. In order to understand this situation, we need to recall the recent situation in the Red Sea. The Houthis plan to put pressure on Israel by intercepting Israeli-linked ships in order to facilitate a ceasefire in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For this reason, Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt have chosen to turn a blind eye to the Houthis. And the Houthis rose to fame after challenging Israel's ** routes. However, this action unexpectedly had a serious impact on the world**, causing huge losses to Western companies. Faced with this situation, the United States decided to take action and sank three Houthi boats to show its resolve and strength. However, why the United States took the risk of taking this action remains a mystery. The likelihood of involving the United States in the conflict is slim relative to the spread of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, so the negative impact of the blockage of the Red Sea route is relatively limited. So why did the United States choose to take action?
It should be emphasized that an early ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will do more harm than harm to the United States. However, it is not easy to achieve this goal. Because the United States, like many Western countries, is on the side of Israel. This means that the United States can only put pressure on the Houthis to show support for Israel and protect its strategic interests in the Middle East. In addition, the author of the **report has close ties to the American Conservative Party (Republican), which may be related to the upcoming **. In any case, in this article, the expert did point out the current situation. The war is already very close to the United States and not limited to the Middle East. The crisis in Venezuela, the crisis on the Korean Peninsula, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict could pose potential risks to the United States. Of course, only time will tell whether the United States will be involved in these conflicts and on what scale. But there is no doubt that the United States is facing a potential threat of war.
For many people, war is a "money-burning" activity. However, the United States seems to have a different view on this. In the eyes of the United States, war is a tool for enriching itself. By provoking a war, the United States can not only sell to the warring parties, but also expand its own sales market by sending it to neighboring countries. However, there is a prerequisite for this to happen: the United States itself cannot be involved in the war. After all, the United States can only benefit the most from it if it remains neutral. Today, however, the United States is far less controllable. Taking the withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict as examples, the United States has clearly shown its "very responsible" side. Especially in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the United States did not hesitate to involve itself in it. Such behavior is puzzling. The likelihood of involving the United States in the conflict is slim relative to the spread of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, so the negative impact of the blockage of the Red Sea route is relatively limited. So why did the United States choose to take the risk?
To put it simply, an early ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will do more good than harm to the United States. However, achieving this goal is not easy. Because the United States, like many Western countries, is on the side of Israel. This means that the United States can only put pressure on the Houthis, both to show support for Israel and to safeguard its own strategic interests in the Middle East. In addition, the ** who reported this article has close ties to the US Conservative Party (Republican), which may have something to do with the upcoming **.
However, we have to admit the big truth of what the expert said: the war is very close to the United States, and not only in the Middle East. The crisis in Venezuela, tensions on the Korean Peninsula, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict all pose potential risks to the United States. As to whether and to what extent the United States will be drawn into these conflicts, only time will tell.
The United States calls itself the "world's policeman", but instead of acting like a policeman should be, it frequently provokes disputes, leading to many wars around the world that are related to the United States. However, in a sense, the United States is indeed very good at finding business opportunities. In the eyes of most people, war is a very "money-burning" activity, and it is. However, in the eyes of the United States, war has become a means of enriching itself. By provoking a war, the United States can not only sell to the warring parties, but also expand the sales market by selling to neighboring countries. However, there is a prerequisite for this to happen: the United States itself cannot be involved in the war. Only by remaining neutral can the United States gain maximum from it.
Today, however, the United States is far less controllable. In particular, in the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the United States has shown its "very responsible" side, even at the expense of drawing itself into the quagmire of war. And recently, one expert noted that another war in the Middle East is beckoning to the United States, and the opponent will be the Houthis in Yemen. According to the expert, the Houthis originally intended to put pressure on Israel by intercepting ships linked to Israel in order to promote a ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. However, this action has led to a severe global impact, with huge losses for Western companies. In order to demonstrate its support for Israel and defend its strategic interests in the Middle East, the United States opted to take action and sank three Houthi boats.
However, the motivation of the United States for this decision remains puzzling. The likelihood of involving the United States in the conflict is slim relative to the spread of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, so the negative impact of the blockage of the Red Sea route is relatively limited. So why did the United States choose to take the risk?
To put it simply, the reason why the United States chose to take action is that an early ceasefire in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict will do more harm than harm to it. However, achieving this goal is not easy. Because the United States, like many Western countries, is on the side of Israel. This means that the United States can only put pressure on the Houthis to show support for Israel and defend its own strategic interests in the Middle East.
However, we have to admit the fact that the war is very close to the United States and not limited to the Middle East. The crisis in Venezuela, the crisis on the Korean Peninsula, and the Russia-Ukraine conflict all pose potential risks to the United States. As for whether and to what extent the United States will be involved in these conflicts, only time will tell. But in any case, the expert is telling the big truth, the United States is facing a potential threat of war.