There is an old saying in my country, heroes don't ask where they come from, and wealth should think about the reason. It means that the hero should not ask about his origin, but should think about his reasons when he is rich, just like drinking water and thinking about the source. But in the workplace, you must not only ask where the hero comes from, but also set countless thresholds with you in terms of resume and education.
Recently, the topic of "first degree" has once again sparked heated discussions, and many workers have encountered the restriction of "first degree" in the process of job hunting, even if they graduated from 985 colleges and universities with a master's degree, they were blocked out of the door just because the undergraduate school was a double non (non-985 non-211) university. There are even doctoral resumes in a university that are rudely returned, and the reason is only that the first degree is a junior college.
For such topics, the Ministry of Education once publicly replied that the concept of "first degree" is completely absent in the relevant policies and documents of the national education administrative department, but in actual recruitment, the phenomenon of "first degree" as an evaluation criterion still exists in a large area.
The overemphasis on "first education" in corporate recruitment is likely to lead to de facto employment discrimination, which has been criticized by public opinion and the public. The crux of the problem is that as the number of college graduates continues to reach new highs, the overall labor market is oversupplied, resulting in higher recruitment standards. Especially in first-tier cities, all kinds of talents gather, and enterprises have a large space to choose, so they are naturally more inclined to choose students from prestigious schools.
The best of the best in enterprise recruitment seems to be the autonomy of employment, and it seems that it is not the turn of others to put their beaks. However, overemphasizing the employment criteria of "only prestigious schools" and "only academic qualifications" is not only biased, but also, in a sense, suspected of violating the relevant equality provisions of the labor law.
The author has participated in the recruitment and selection of major enterprises as an interviewer all the year round, and I would like to say that there have been models of eclectic talent reduction in ancient times, and the "first degree" is only an evaluation of the phased learning results, and cannot fully reflect a person's knowledge reserves, technical level and comprehensive literacy. It affects the company's demand for different talents, and also has a negative impact on the company's employer brand image.
Therefore, what we need to establish and improve is a pluralistic evaluation standard for talents. Enterprise recruitment needs to be comprehensively considered, looking at academic qualifications but not only academic qualifications; Look at academic performance, but also look at comprehensive quality; Look at the theoretical literacy, but also look at the innovation ability; Look at school performance, and re-engage in hands-on ability. Enterprises should scientifically refine the talent standards in the recruitment conditions, and strive to find people with problem-solving skills in interviews, rather than people who only have the halo of a prestigious school.
As job seekers, fresh graduates need to pay attention to the recruitment conditions and needs of different types of enterprises, and make career planning as soon as possible, especially in internships, to improve the competitiveness of positions and make up for disadvantages in other aspects; It is important for socially recruited workers to choose positions that match their own work experience and match their own strengths and strengths, rather than casting a net everywhere, otherwise the company must use a simple and crude way to screen out unsuitable people on the premise of saving time. At the same time, if you want to have bargaining power and the initiative in job hunting in the workplace, you must constantly improve your own strength, after all, strength is king.
What do you think about the "first degree" restriction in job hunting?