The EU has made a bad start, and the proceeds of Russian assets will go to Ukraine?

Mondo International Updated on 2024-02-20

The EU has set a very bad precedent, and the United States is about to set a very bad precedent. What does it mean that the world will suffer a major setback? Let's take a look at the news.

What does European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen mean when he notes that the EU will use part of the proceeds of Russian assets in the EU for the legitimization of Ukraine in recent days?

There are a few key words in this, first, it is the Russian assets in the EU, that is, the income of Russian assets, and the income is the value-added part that we mentioned. For example, if Russia's assets are hundreds of billions of dollars, the gains will be at least tens or even tens of billions of dollars. To whom is this money given? This money is going to be used by Ukraine to fight Russia.

The Foreign Relations Committee of the US House of Representatives also gave a corresponding opinion, that is, it hopes to confiscate Russian assets in the United States, and even give this part of the assets to Ukraine for use against Russia. Everyone understands that in the United States, the European Union and other so-called Western countries, they are protecting assets and protecting foreign investments. This part of the income was originally owned by Russia, or by some enterprises in Russia.

If these benefits are given to Ukraine, it means that the United States, the European Union and other countries will lose the spirit of the contract, they will violate their own laws, and even violate their own constitution, what will be the result?

On the surface, it is helping Ukraine, but in fact it has damaged the credibility of the European Union, damaged the credibility of the United States, and made the United States and the European Union lose more investment from abroad in the future. Who would dare to put money and assets in Europe and the United States? Once you sanction a certain country, you will freeze the assets of the citizens of those countries overseas, and even realize it, and even give some of the appreciation of the assets to certain people, do you think this thing is reasonable? Of course it doesn't make sense! Once this happens, it will lead to an abrupt end to world economic integration, which is not alarmist, and it is also an important manifestation of the decoupling and breaking of the chain in many countries.

Therefore, the derivative effect of the Russian-Ukrainian military conflict is far more than the hegemony between the United States and Russia, and it is far more than a geopolitical and military conflict!

February** Dynamic Incentive Program

Related Pages