The data given by the analysis agency OpenSignal pointed out that the average speed of Chinese mobile phone users is lower than that of Indian users, which shows that China's 5G lags behind India, in fact, this is a one-sided statement, the 5G network capabilities of Chinese operators are definitely stronger than Indian operators, but Chinese users dare not use it, and Indian users dare to use it, which is the key to the gap between the mobile data rates of users in the two countries.
Take the official announcement of an operator in China as an example, 59 yuan** only contains 10GB traffic, and 5G speed test is 2GB-3GB traffic at a time, in this case, how many Chinese mobile phone users dare to use speed test software to test 5G rate, and even ** software is often used WiFi, not 4G or 5G network.
This leads to the fact that most of the time Chinese mobile phone users only use the 4G 5G network to watch news, various information, etc., and they may not dare to use the 4G 5G network, which leads to the low average speed of Chinese users.
For example, an operator in China has 900 million users, of which only 200 million users with a high consumption level don't care, usually use mobile data software, brushing, their average speed can reach 100Mbps; Another 700 million users, just to watch the news, once **software, brushing** to use wifi, so their average speed is as low as 10mbps, so that the average mobile data rate of all users will be as low as 50mbps.
In contrast, India's largest operator JIO pushes 4G*** on the official website and business hall with low and high traffic, and India** reported that a traffic provided by JIO is 1234 rupees for 1 year 168GB traffic, which is about 108 yuan, which is about 9 yuan per month to send 14GB traffic, and calls are free.
In this case, of course, Indian users dare to use 4G 5G network **software, brush**, etc., and their mobile phone users' mobile data can reach 51Mbps on average, and the average speed is higher than that of Chinese mobile phone users.
There is also a very low penetration rate of fixed-line broadband in India, because India's telecommunication infrastructure is too poor, and many rural areas do not even have power grids, and naturally there will be no fixed-line broadband, which leads to most consumers in India who can only use paid mobile communication networks to access the Internet.
The average rate of subscribers does not necessarily mean that India's mobile communication network is more advanced than China's. According to data disclosed by India**, the number of 5G base stations built by Jio, India's largest operator, is about 110,000 5G macro stations, and 590,000 small base stations and micro base stations.
China's largest operator, China Mobile, has built nearly 2 million 5G base stations, and the number of 5G base stations built by China's three major operators accounts for 60% of the number of 5G base stations in the world.
In terms of network construction, the 4G and 5G network coverage and speed of Chinese operators should far exceed that of Indian operators, but their 5G *** is too expensive and contains too little traffic, resulting in users not daring to use it. Suppose that Chinese operators can provide users with an average speed of 200Mbps, but the average speed of 50Mbps actually used by users only accounts for a quarter of the operator's capacity. Indian operators can only provide an average speed of 80Mbps per person, while the average speed of 51Mbps for Indian users has reached more than 60% of the capacity of Indian operators**.
In general, the network coverage and network capacity of Chinese operators are definitely ahead of Indian operators, but users dare not use 4G 5G*** in the Chinese market because they are too expensive and contain too little capacity. The network coverage and network capacity of Indian operators lag behind that of Chinese operators, but Indian users dare to use it, so the average speed of Indian mobile phone users exceeds that of Chinese mobile phone users.