Judging from the examination situation of the note examination in recent years, the examination mainly assesses candidates through two question types: objective questions and subjective questions, and the score ratio of the two question types is 1:1. When candidates practice in preparing for the exam, it is not difficult to find that compared with subjective questions that require a large number of calculation steps or text descriptions, objective questions that only need to choose the correct option are easier to answer and easier to score, so is this really the case? Let's take a look!
For most candidates, objective questions are easier to answer, and even if they can't get the right answer, it's not uncommon for them to be "blinded" correctly.
Compared with subjective questions, it is not only difficult to answer, but also more difficult to get points, such as accounting, financial management and other science subjects, when answering, it is generally clearly required that the questions involving calculation need to list the answer steps, while for liberal arts subjects such as economic law, the answer to subjective questions needs to be rigorous, comprehensive and clear.
Therefore, in the case of the same score, getting more points on objective questions that are easier to score can increase the candidate's chance of clearing the customs, which is also one of the very practical clearance skills.
Recently, the results of the review of the examination results have been issued, and some of the candidates who participated in the review can completely turn the tables, while others need to fight again in the coming year. However, although the results of the review fail, they can provide candidates with the scores of objective and subjective questions, and clarify the direction for the next year's preparation.
After the result review, many candidates found that they had overturned in the answer to the objective question!
Source: Weibo
Why do many test takers fail in objective questions that are easier to answer, and even score worse than subjective questions? Read on to analyze it below.
Teacher Zhao Xiaobin analyzed the reasons for the low score of objective questions, one of which is that when studying in the basic stage, some candidates may choose 18x or even 2x faster lessons. After listening to the basic stage courses, not only fail to digest and absorb the basic knowledge points, but also may miss the details emphasized, and its negative impact will appear when practicing in the intensive stage, and these candidates will often be confused by the more basic exercises. So what is the right way to learn?
First of all, it is not advisable to listen to lectures at a double speed, especially in the basic stage. Secondly, in the process of listening to the class, you should also summarize for a long time, summarize more, think and distinguish in connection with the relevant knowledge points, listen to the content you don't understand repeatedly, and do not leave any doubts when listening to the class. Only by completing a round of exam preparation in this way can you build a good foundation for subsequent exam preparations!
In addition, judging from the official examination syllabus released over the years, the knowledge points in the textbooks are mainly divided into "three ability levels."
Among them, the test center of competency level 1 is usually tested in the form of multiple-choice questions in the exam, although it does not mean that the content of competency level 2 and 3 is not examined, and a certain proportion is involved, but most of them are the content of competency level 1. This part tests the candidate's ability to understand basic concepts and basic principles.
The content of this part of the ability level 1 is often not the "key" commonly referred to, and the candidates will not allocate much time and energy to this part of the knowledge points from learning or from the exercises, which is easier to ignore in the preparation process, which is also one of the reasons for the failure of objective questions.
After mastering the correct learning methods, if you want to not overturn on the objective questions, you must also master the corresponding skills in doing and answering questions, such as the more basic elimination method, guessing method, comparison method and other answering methods need to be exercised more, so as to achieve proficient application. Learning skills need to be summarized and perfected by candidates in continuous practice, and at the same time, we must remind all candidates that the following three minefields must not be stepped on!
You can't do questions for the sake of doing questions, reflect more and summarize more!
Don't do questions for the sake of doing them, you need to reflect more. Making good use of mind maps is a good way to summarize knowledge points, which can help students form a knowledge system and establish a "big tree" of knowledge system, without being entangled in various details.
In addition, when brushing the question, you should ask more "why", which knowledge point of which chapter is examined, what is the idea of the proposition, and learn to think from the perspective of the questioner, there will be unexpected gains.
Selecting practice topics should not be a blind pursuit of quantity.
The time for review is limited, how to devote the limited time to in-depth review, and how not to let yourself "drown" in the sea of questions? Candidates should think carefully about the preparation strategy that is suitable for them.
There are not many topics, and doing a good question may make you "wake up and be empowered"; And brushing a bunch of bad or repetitive questions will often only waste your time and get half the result.
Learn to give up strategically and arrange the time for answering questions reasonably
Arrange the time to do the questions reasonably, be sure to practice the speed of doing the questions when you usually do the questions, especially if the objective questions can immediately identify the accurate answers, do not hesitate, try to complete them as quickly and with high quality, and reserve enough time for the short-answer questions and comprehensive questions.
If you encounter a question that you don't know, skip it if you can, and give priority to getting the question you know right. For questions that you really can't know, you must learn to "give up strategically", don't pursue perfection, "60 points long live" is not an exaggeration at all!
In addition to the reasons why the objective questions may be failed in the above two points, candidates should analyze according to their actual situation, so as to solve the problem with the right medicine! The 2024 exam will be held in late August, and the study time is getting tighter, so don't wait and see if you want to take the exam, and now you can prepare for the new exam season!