The freighter was hit by Houthi missiles, and the hull caught fire. The British freighter Marin Luanda was attacked in the Gulf of Aden, carrying 22 Indian and one Bangladeshi crew members. The ship was loaded with a large amount of Russian "naphtha". Indian destroyers went to put out the fire. The Houthis claimed that the attack included British and American ships, in connection with previous British and American air strikes in Yemen. However, the British ship was laden with Russian naphtha, raising questions given that the West resumed oil imports from Russia in October 2023. The Houthi attacks were triggered by strategic oil resources, but they also involved Indians, and relations with the Indian state were not direct. The United States and Britain have the ability to carry out air strikes on Yemen, but the Houthis are from the civilian population, and it is normal to fight back. The Houthis have been invaded by the United States and Britain, threatening to fight back and accuse the West of unjustified aggression. There were attacks, but for the actions of civilian forces, they were triggered by violence, and he pointed out that he had no right to criticize the efforts to protect his homeland.
British freighter in the Gulf of Aden was attacked
The cargo ship "Marin Luanda" in the Gulf of Aden was hit by a Houthi missile, which caused the hull to burst into flames. The ship carried 22 Indian and one Bangladeshi crew members, and carried a large amount of Russian "naphtha" in the hold. After the incident, the Indian destroyer rushed to extinguish the fire in order to protect the crew and prevent the further expansion of the oil spill. The incident has raised concerns about the security of the Gulf of Aden region, but it has also involved concerns in many countries.
Russian naphtha raises questions
The Houthis claimed that the attack included British and American ships, and the remarks were linked to previous British and American airstrikes in Yemen. However, it is puzzling that the British freighter that was attacked was laden with Russian naphtha. This raises questions considering that the West resumed oil imports from Russia in October 2023. Whether there is an interweaving of interests behind it has become the focus of people's attention.
India intervened to extinguish the fires
After the missile attack on the freighter, the Indian destroyer was dispatched to put out the fire. The aim of the operation was to protect the lives of the crew and at the same time avoid environmental problems caused by naphtha spills. India's involvement has made the incident involve international cooperation and coordination, while also maintaining maritime security.
Houthi statements and counterattacks
The Houthis claimed that the attack covered British and American ships, linking it to previous airstrikes. However, the Houthi statement did not mention the cause of Russian naphtha, making the incident confusing. The Houthis, who have been invaded by the United States and Britain, have threatened to fight back and accused the West of unjustified aggression. The retaliatory declaration raised doubts about the Houthis' true intentions and made the whole affair confusing.
Petroleum strategic resources are triggered
This complicates the attack by involving strategic oil resources. As the West restarted importing oil from Russia in October 2023, concerns have been raised about its dependence on energy. Whether the Houthi attacks are directly related to strategic oil resources has become a central issue of international concern. The incident has triggered a rethinking of global energy security.
Actions and counterattacks by civilian forces
Although the United States and Britain have the ability to carry out airstrikes, the Houthis come from civilian sources. The counterattack against such a non-state regular army has sparked a discussion about legitimacy. In the eyes of the Houthis, they are fighting back in self-defense, because they claim to have been invaded by the United States and Britain. The angle complicates the whole affair and raises questions about the legitimacy of international military operations.
in the attack
Throughout the attack, all parties have different interpretations of the truth behind the incident. The wrestling over naphtha, international cooperation, strategic oil resources, and civilian armed forces makes the incident seem complicated. Although the Houthis have been criticized for their actions, it is not uncommon for civilian forces to fight back against violence internationally. The development of events will involve calm thinking and wise decision-making by all parties in order to find a reasonable solution.
In the case of the attack on a British freighter in the Gulf of Aden, various factors intertwined, making the whole incident complicated and complicated. From the transportation of naphtha to the Houthi counterattack, to international concerns about strategic oil resources, regional security and global energy security are closely linked. The interpretation of the incident needs to be cautious and objective, and at the same time, States should respond calmly and seek a solution that is consistent with international law and morality.