The countryside is a place full of life interest and local flavor, however, when it comes to village cadres, you can often feel the resentment contained in the peasant friends.
Praise seems to be scarce, but criticism is endless.
Why do farmers have such mixed feelings for village cadres? What kind of problems and dilemmas are hidden in this?
Survey on the Current Situation of Rural Village Cadres: Election Traps, Younger Dilemmas, Why Are Farmers' Friends Polarized?
In contemporary rural society, democratic elections are supposed to be a way to achieve self-government, but the implementation of this system has brought a series of problems.
The peasants were too idealistic about democratic elections, and too much trust became a phenomenon of canvassing and buying votes in the election process.
This has led to some people with low quality blending into the ranks of village officials, and the negative image is deeply rooted.
How to solve the election trap has become an urgent problem to be solved.
The real face of the rural village officials**: The office is hard, the hometown is strife, why do the people feel complex and contradictory?
The trend of making the ranks of village officials younger and more knowledgeable should have injected new vitality into the rural areas.
Young people's acceptance of outside ideas has led to a weak collective economy, and even some villages have no collective economy to speak of.
Village officials are busy with various tasks from their superiors, but it is difficult for them to go down to the grassroots level to solve practical problems, which leads to negative perceptions among the people.
How to find a balance between the office and the grassroots has become a difficult problem that needs to be considered urgently.
The village officials are all locals, and this kinship and neighborhood relationship brings complex entanglements.
In rural areas with a low level of education, the way of handling affairs is often more extreme, and even leads to disputes over the loss of an inch of land.
It is difficult for village officials to be completely neutral in handling disputes, which further escalates neighborhood conflicts.
In such a complex relationship, how to maintain justice for village officials has become a serious question in front of them.
Behind the rural self-government system: the hidden dangers of democratic elections and the low quality of village officials, why do peasant friends complain?
The implementation of the rural self-government system provides farmers with the opportunity to participate in the management of their villages, however, excessive expectations have led to the actual existence of collective decision-making.
The unhealthy tendencies in the election process made the peasants doubt the whole system.
The quality of village officials has also become a bottleneck restricting the development of villages.
How to solve the hidden dangers of elections and improve the quality of village officials at the institutional level has become an urgent problem to be solved.
In order to solve the negative impression of peasants on village cadres, it is necessary to start from various aspects such as system, management, and training.
The innovation of the system and the improvement of the quality of the village officials are the key to the revitalization of the rural areas.
At the same time, village officials also need to go down to the grassroots level to understand the real needs of farmers and actively solve practical problems.
Only in this way can we gradually improve the image of village officials and win the trust and support of the villagers.
Write at the end:
In the construction of the new countryside, the role of rural village officials is very important.
Only by solving the problems of election traps, the dilemma of youth, complex relationships, institutional problems, and the improvement of the image of village officials can the revitalization of the new countryside be truly realized.
Farmers also need to understand more, and working together with each other is the key to solving the problem.
The road to rural revitalization is long, and we look forward to witnessing the new vitality of rural areas with joint efforts.
February** Dynamic Incentive Program