In the great journey of rural revitalization, cadres stationed in villages are indispensable backbones. Shouldering the heavy trust of the party and the people, they go deep into the grassroots and eat, live and work with the masses, aiming to promote the comprehensive economic and social development of the rural areas. However, in reality, there is a phenomenon that some cadres stationed in villages have become "moths in the villages", which not only deviates from the original intention, but also damages the image of the party and the masses in the hearts of the masses.
The typical performance of the cadres of the "moth village" is that they are not truthful in their work style and do not perform their duties effectively. They regard the "village" as a springboard for mixing grassroots work experience, and they have no real name and occupy a place without seeking a job. This kind of behavior not only wastes precious resources, but also deprives the rural areas and farmers who really need help from the support they deserve. In the eyes of the masses, these cadres are like "occupying the pit and not shiting", which has become a stumbling block on the road to rural revitalization.
In addition to inaction, cadres who "moth villages" may also act indiscriminately and give blind commands. They have overstepped their responsibilities in handling affairs, disrespected the opinions of village cadres and the opinions of village conditions and public opinion, and even engaged in "one-word halls." This way of working is very easy to trigger a "rejection reaction" with local folk customs, resulting in the idling of grassroots work, and the loss of money and labor. This not only runs counter to the original intention of the cadres stationed in the villages, but is also likely to intensify the contradictions between the cadres and the masses and affect social stability.
In order to avoid the phenomenon of "village moth", we need to work together. First of all, it is necessary to improve the mechanism for selecting and promoting cadres stationed in villages, and ensure that the cadres selected and dispatched to the grassroots level have the awareness of learning from real ability and serving the people. Second, it is necessary to strengthen the training and management of cadres stationed in villages, enhance their professional ability and political literacy, and ensure that they can play their due role at the grassroots level. At the same time, it is necessary to establish a sound appraisal mechanism, scientifically evaluate the work performance of cadres stationed in villages, and encourage them to contribute their wisdom and strength to rural development.
It is also necessary to strengthen social supervision and let the masses participate in the evaluation of cadres stationed in villages. Through an open and transparent way, let the masses understand the work of cadres stationed in villages and supervise their performance of duties. With regard to problems that the masses have strongly resented, it is necessary to investigate and deal with them in a timely manner and give them a satisfactory answer.
Village-based cadres are an important force in rural revitalization, and they should become "boosters" to help rural development, rather than "stumbling blocks" to hinder development. Only through the joint efforts of all parties, strengthening selection, training, management and assessment, and strengthening social supervision, can the cadres stationed in the village truly "help the village" and contribute their due strength to rural revitalization.