"Tower No. 22" in the border area of Jordan and SyriaMilitaryThe base was attacked and causedU.S. military** After that, Biden is faced with an important choice, that is, whether to authorize the Middle EastMilitaryLet's go. In response to this issue, Biden needs to consider various factors, and his decision will be the most important in his tenureCriticalMeaning of one of the decisions.
For this attack, "Tower No. 22".MilitaryThe base is a small but assembled aviation, engineering, logistics and other forcesMilitaryBase. Three people were killed in the attackU.S. militaryPeople died, more than 40 were injured. Within Congress, some hard-line lawmakers have pressed Biden to take direct action against Iran. Even Biden's political opponentsTrumpHe also took the opportunity to taunt and accuse him of weakness.
However, Biden will really take IranMilitaryAction? If the pressure reaches a certain level, this possibility exists. Biden can be fromMilitaryAdvisors get a variety of options, ranging from symbolic actions to "severe punishments". However, what kind of action to take will be a test, because the United States faces many difficulties.
If war is to be waged against Iran, a large-scale ground operation is an option. Iran is a country that is easy to defend and difficult to attack, hasPlateauMountains and a large number of desert basins. Biden should remember the messy scene at the time of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, so ground operations can be almost ruled out of consideration.
Therefore, the priority option that can be considered at the moment is air strikes. According to the message,U.S. militaryProbably, 6 KC-135s have already been placedFuel dispenserTransferred to the Middle East to prepare for an impending cross-border air raid. U.S. militaryAviation forces in the Middle East can be relied uponFuel dispenserto deliver precision strikes on deep targets in Iran.
Considered beforeU.S. militaryThe air campaign against Yemen, purportedly against the HouthisArmedofMissileswithDronesLaunch positions to strike, which can be learned from the strike on Iran. In addition,U.S. militaryThere is also the possibility of attacking IranNavyPorts, ships, and Revolutionary Guard targets. In any case, there are many more suitable targets for combat.
IfU.S. militaryAn air strike on Iran may be difficult for Iran to withstand. However, Iran is forU.S. militaryStrongly denied involvement in the attack on the base, stressing that it was a regionArmedSpontaneous behavior. The meaning of Iran is obvious, that is, Tehran to pro-IranArmedThe control is not enoughU.S. militaryTaking action against Iran will only provoke pro-IranArmedof further counterattacks.
IranArmyThe generals issued stern warnings that the army was ready and ready to repel the invading enemy. This may be a cautionary taleU.S. militaryDo not attempt a ground invasion. Although difficult to match in air combat, Iran, with the advantage of terrain, may give way in ground combatU.S. militaryUnprepared. In addition, Iran has years of accumulationMissilespower, by building underground "Missilescity" to hide the strength,CriticalThe moment can be on the Middle EastU.S. militaryBases and Israel strike.
In the face of Iran, which is not easy to mess with, the White House made it clear for the first time that it did not want to go to war with it. This may be a delaying tactic, but it is also a realistic compromise. Biden needs to consider not only foreign issues, but also domestic political factors in the United States. Trumpand his supporters mock him for being weak, but if he starts a war rashly, it could lead to even greater consequences, and even lead to his defeat in 2024**. To do it or not to do it, it's a "damn" choice.
However, the foreign media generally believe that the war is difficult to control. OnlyU.S. militaryIf you dare to fire the first shot, Iran will retaliate, and the situation will continue to escalate, and it may even trigger a full-scale war in the Middle East. Now that the eyes of the world are focused on the Middle East, the whole world is worried about the retaliation of the United States, fearing that it will eventually trigger a full-scale war in the Middle East.
Biden on whether to authorizeMilitaryCareful consideration was given to the matter of action, and the most appropriate option was selected from a variety of options. He faces tremendous pressures and challenges, weighing domestic and foreign factors, as well as possible consequences and risks. In this decision, he will think not only about *** and regional stability, but also about the future of his political career. Whatever Biden ultimately decides, he will face criticism and controversy.
Personally, I think Biden should try his best to avoid itMilitaryaction, but to resolve the current tensions through diplomacy and negotiations. MilitaryThe action could lead to even greater fighting, with catastrophic consequences for the Middle East and the world. In addition, Biden should also be withInternationalSocial cooperation and joint efforts to promote the settlement of the Iranian nuclear issue in order to maintain regional peace and stability. Most importantly, to avoid unnecessary conflicts and to safeguard people's lives and security.