According to the "Half Moon Talk" report, at present, there are frequent strange phenomena of irregularities in the measurement of yield in some local agricultural experimental fields, "seawater rice" is mixed with fresh water, and various "high-yield records" are constantly being refreshed. In some places, the same variety of rice from other places is transplanted into the experimental fields in order to make the data look good, or other rice is hidden in ditches, harvesters or ground cloths, and quietly mixed into the rice with the measured yield while the chaos is taking advantage of the chaos.
In some places, what should be rigorous agricultural research projects have been manipulated and cheated, with the result that the data is becoming more and more eye-catching, and the direct value of food production is very limited. One-sided exaggeration of farmland yields per mu and ignoring the real level of grain productivity ultimately hurt agricultural production.
Taking "seawater rice" as an example, the regulations on freshwater irrigation and the use of barrier agents in formal experiments are very strict, but when some places tout the "seawater rice" for freshwater irrigation breaks new records, in addition to deceiving the superiors, how much practical value is such an agricultural scientific research "political achievement"? In this regard, we must investigate to the end and hold people accountable.
Specifically, the production measurement data continues to be "inflated", which is first related to the current rush for quick success and quick profits of many agricultural enterprises. These companies are either for the purpose of brand marketing, or in order to defraud scientific research project funding subsidies, cheating, casually measuring production, and showing off themselves with good-looking data, all kinds of bad deeds make people angry. Such cheating is so blatant that "sometimes companies have to 'thank' the staff responsible for the records and the farmers who harvest them".
Secondly, this move is also related to the lack of scientific rigor of some experts. Individual experts take money to do things, completely losing the bottom line of scientists seeking truth and being pragmatic. According to reports, some of the production measurement experts work part-time in production measurement enterprises, and some are hired by spending huge "consulting fees".
And some places also intentionally or unintentionally act as the endorser of the "high yield record", instead of effectively fulfilling their regulatory responsibilities and consolidating every link in strict accordance with the relevant procedures, they organize ** reports to publicize and build momentum according to the caliber of the enterprise, and use it as a political performance project. This is obviously a misrecitation of the scriptures, and it is suspected of dereliction of duty or even dereliction of duty.
It can be seen that although the phenomenon of irregularities in yield measurement occurs in agricultural enterprises, the root system does not stop there, but spreads wantonly to scientific research institutions, local governments and some experts, as if a gray chain of interests has been formed.
The slogan is broken through the sky, and it is better for farmers to try planting at one time. The ultimate test of the effectiveness of agricultural experiments is the market. Yuan Longping's super rice advantage is **? It's in the word of mouth of the farmers. Always thinking of deceiving the world and stealing fame with digital competition will inevitably be rejected by the market and farmers.
Of course, this kind of chaos also reminds the relevant agricultural management departments that they should establish corresponding technical specifications for yield measurement and strictly supervise and manage all links. At present, the application of information technology is very popular, it is advisable to fully introduce the field of production measurement, realize the full link recording of various test data, conditions and results, speak with data, trace the source, and avoid human manipulation as much as possible.
At the same time, it is also necessary to formulate rules to restrain agricultural enterprises and agricultural experts, and put an end to the kind of "running projects" and "accumulating popularity" shows. Agricultural production is not a trivial matter, and once a few people are allowed to arbitrarily arrange data, it will inevitably mislead agricultural production.
*: The Paper.