Introduction:
Academics have been working hard for many years, but when an article is published, the author's name becomes a topic of debate. In recent years, the frequent occurrence of academic misconduct in the academic community has attracted widespread attention. As the author's clerical assistant, I must not only understand the circumstances of various signatures, but also understand the causes thereof, and more importantly, I must recognize the intensity and intensity of the investigation and punishment of academic misconduct by the relevant authorities. Let's take a deeper look at this complex and far-reaching issue, and the academic ethics and social responsibility it contains.
Analysis of the reasons for plagiarism in the article:
In the academic world, many scholars are chasing the fame and glory of themselves or their groups, so the issue of authorship has attracted more and more attention. At the same time as the academic publication is formal, there are many academic misconduct. Some organizations and individuals use money to exchange inappropriate names, some want to use the star effect to increase the popularity of their articles, some people want to avoid academic misconduct, some people want to avoid being detected, and some people simply keep their research results for themselves. In this case, we should seriously consider how to better restrain the author's attribution to ensure academic fairness and impartiality.
Extension: Signing is a very complicated thing for an academic article. Under the "light of academics", **inappropriate** appears frequently, which is really worrying. In recent years, the phenomenon of academic anomie in China's university libraries has seriously affected the fairness and credibility of academics. This is a huge test for scholars who have worked hard and adhered to academic ethics. To this end, it is necessary to have a comprehensive understanding of the various problems in academic research, not only to condemn them, but also to govern them from the perspective of standardization and institutionalization, so as to effectively prevent and treat them and maintain the purity and integrity of academic research.
1. Frequent anonymous transactions and hot spots:
In China, "buyer" and "buyer" are a relatively common "improper" behavior. In order to obtain the author's right of authorship, some scholars exchange money for improper reputation and gain. In addition, the phenomenon of "glossy" signatures is becoming more and more serious, and some writers do not hesitate to advertise themselves or their groups as "pseudonyms" in order to increase the prestige of themselves or their groups. The emergence of these problems has greatly affected the objectivity and fairness of academic evaluation.
Expansion: Due to the emergence of buyers and sellers and indirect authors in the process of academic publishing, the academic community is shrouded in a haze. Through the way of payment, the reputation and identity of scholars have become objects that can be bought and sold commercially, and they have lost their due significance. The "polished" writing highlights some of the phenomena of "fame and profit" and "conformity", which not only lacks independent thinking, but also constitutes a severe test of academic integrity. To this end, it is necessary to establish a stricter academic ethics to eliminate academic misconduct.
2. Legal disputes and ethical crises caused by improper signatures.
In recent years, a large number of academic misconduct has occurred in China's university libraries, which has led to a series of legal disputes and ethical crises. In order to protect their academic rights, some scholars have resorted to judicial means in order to protect their academic rights. In addition, some scholars publish articles in the name of "pseudonym" and "plagiarism", which has caused a slippery slope of academic ethics and caused contradictions between "academic groups". The emergence of this anomie not only damages academic fairness, but also damages academic cohesion and trust.
*Extension: The academic controversy and ethical dilemma caused by the author's improper signature has become a problem that cannot be ignored. This kind of controversy not only infringes on the legitimate rights of relevant subjects, but also affects the foundation of the academic community. Mutual trust and cooperation should be the premise of learning, and we should not compete with each other because of our own interests. To this end, it is necessary to increase the supervision and punishment of academic anomie, so that those who violate academic norms are punished accordingly, and academic order and ethical norms must be restored.
3. A series of policies on anonymity have been introduced:
In response to this phenomenon, the relevant authorities have successively promulgated a series of laws and regulations to curb the occurrence of academic misconduct. For the first time, the concept of "improper attribution" was added to the "Academic Publishing Norms - Definition of Academic Misconduct in Journals", and corresponding penalties were imposed on it. In addition, the relevant opinions issued by the General Office of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the Communist Party of China also clearly pointed out that the order of authorship should be determined strictly according to the author's personal contributions, and the phenomenon of scribbling should be prohibited.
Extended reading: With the increasingly serious phenomenon of academic anomie in China, it has become a top priority for relevant parties to take corresponding measures to control the chaotic phenomenon of published articles. This series of policy formulations has played a great role in controlling the academic anomie of college students. Only by formulating laws and regulations and strengthening supervision can we truly achieve a good academic ecology and maintain a good academic order. Through the implementation of the above rules, it can not only play a disciplinary role in punishing violators, but also promote the improvement of the quality and credibility of academic research, and promote the healthy development of academic research.
Conclusion: At present, there are a large number of "random signatures" in university journals in China, which is a major problem that cannot be ignored in university journals. Under such circumstances, as a scholar, we must uphold the spirit of honesty and responsibility, abide by our professional ethics and standards, and achieve the unity of knowledge and action, and live up to our reputation. Building an honest and fair academic ecology is the consensus of the entire society and an important guarantee for the healthy development of academic research. Let us work together to uphold academic integrity and promote academic development and prosperity.