In fact, the term "dividing the fields into households" is restrictive and one-sided. After the reform and opening up, there are someFarmersIndeed, the right to use the land was obtained through the division of land into households. However, we cannot ignore those who did not have access to landFarmers。theseFarmersDespite not having land, they were not forced to starve because of it. In fact, after decades of development after the reform and opening up, those who have not been allocated landFarmersEat more and better in life. This is a fact that can be seen, so we can't simply say itFarmersOnly by dividing the fields into households can we have enough to eat. In fact,FarmersThey can earn income by working outside the home, which improves their quality of life. FarmersWe get it by going out to workEconomyYes, which can be used for:AgricultureFood production, ensuring that they have enough food to eat.
As part of the reform,FarmersThe right to use the land was obtained, and it was passedAgricultureProduction work is obtained from itEconomyRevenue. However, this does not meanFarmersYou can eat enough to eat on the land alone. Actually, if notFarmersEarned by workers going out to workEconomyYes,FarmersWe're hereAgricultureIn terms of grain production, it is difficult to guarantee one's own food**. This is becauseFarmersIn progressAgricultureIn the production process, a large number of means of production need to be invested, and the quality of these materials is often higher and higher. At the same time, the ** of the grain does not **. IfFarmersIt only relies on the land to be divided into households, and there is no income obtained by going out to workEconomyThe income is used for inputsAgricultureproduction, then they will most likely not be able to get enough food. It's a fact that we hopeFarmersFriends were able to think deeply and observe the last forty years of food ** andAgricultureThe relationship between the investment of production funds. IfFarmersAble to rely on the division of the field to the household, through the cultivation of food willEconomyRevenues are used for:Agricultureproduction capital input cycle, then they will be able to get enough food **.
Over the past forty years, the means of production have been constantly increasing, makingFarmersIt's hard to bear. At the same time, the ** of the grain did not correspond**. This leads to:FarmersIt is difficult to ensure that even the most basic standard of living is achieved. Does this mean forty years after the division of the land?FarmersDidn't really eat enough? Actually, it isFarmersThe embodiment of our small-scale peasant thinking is also what they have been there for a long timeAgricultureStruggle in production. I don't even have a place to eat when I'm old, this isFarmersThe real experience of our lives. Therefore,FarmersFriends should wake up to the fact that only by radically changing the thinking of small farmers and putting themselves inAgricultureThe labor effort in food production is seen as a job and should be justifiedEconomyIncome remuneration can truly realize the distribution of land to householdsFarmersEat a full meal.
It can be seen,FarmersWhether or not you really have enough to eat depends not only on the factor of distributing the land to the household. Dividing land into households is only part of the reformFarmersThey also need other support to secure their lives. Earned by working outside the homeEconomyIncome is:FarmersWe realizeAgricultureAn important support for food production, not just the division of land. FarmersWe should also change the mindset of smallholder farmers to see their labor contribution as a kind of work and should be justifiedEconomyRequite. Only then,FarmersOnly then can we truly achieve a full meal after the field is divided into households. Therefore, we should look at it from a holistic perspectiveFarmersThe living conditions cannot simply be measured by the distribution of land to households. Reform should continue to progress, forFarmersWe provide more support so that they can enjoy a better life.