The post 80s female cadres once threatened to say who can do me? Netizen: Now you know the answer

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-02-01

In the recently aired feature film "Protecting People's Livelihood", a shocking incident was made public. In February last year, a businessman exposed the bribery of a female cadre to the public because it was too expensive to maintain a relationship. This female cadre is Zhang Yue, the former "post-80s" party secretary of Lingjingdian Township, Yangqu County, Shanxi. What is staggering is that she was not only exposed to soliciting nearly 400,000 bribes, but also cried in the feature film: "What do people think of grassroots cadres." ”

It is understood that this businessman met Zhang Yue by chance, hoping to contract township projects through her. However, Zhang Yue pushed the boat along the river, using the power in his hand as a bargaining chip, and repeatedly asked the businessman Yan to pay for his dinner, spending as much as 40,000 yuan before and after. What is even more shocking is that Zhang Yue took it upon himself to hand over some projects to Yan to undertake, with a total cost of up to 2 million yuan, and all of this did not go through the formal bidding process.

However, this is not the first time Zhang Yue has used the power in his hands for personal gain. As early as November last year, Zhang Yue was sentenced to 5 years in prison and fined 250,000 yuan in the first instance for the crime of **. According to the feature film, Zhang Yue has climbed from a grassroots cadre to the position of secretary of the township party committee in just a few years, but in the face of power and **, she has lost herself. She used the power in her hands to abuse her power for personal gain and solicit bribes to collect money, which seriously damaged the interests of the masses and tarnished the image of the party and the party.

This incident has aroused widespread concern and heated discussions from all walks of life. Many people expressed indignation and condemnation of Zhang Yue's behavior, believing that she, as a grassroots cadre, should have set an example and serve the people, but she used her power to seek personal gain, which seriously ruined the image of the party and the people. At the same time, there are also people who appreciate and support the businessman's behavior, believing that he has bravely stood up to expose this unhealthy trend and contributed to the maintenance of social justice.

However, this incident is not just an isolated one. It exposes some common problems in the current supervision of power at the grassroots level. First of all, the imperfection of the supervision mechanism is one of the important reasons for the repeated prohibition of such corrupt practices. Supervision over grassroots cadres should be stricter and more effective to prevent abuse of power and the occurrence of corruption. Second, the restraint and supervision of power still need to be strengthened. Only by strengthening supervision and restraint on power can we fundamentally prevent the occurrence of corruption.

In addition, this incident has also raised people's thoughts about the "high cost of maintaining relationships". In today's society, "maintaining relationships" has become a common phenomenon. However, this kind of "maintenance relationship" is often based on the exchange of interests, which can easily lead to abuse of power and corruption. Therefore, we need to fundamentally change this unhealthy phenomenon of "maintaining relationships" and build healthier and more just social relations.

At the same time, this incident also reminds us that there is still a long way to go in the fight against corruption. We need to continue to strengthen anti-corruption work, strengthen the building of supervision and restraint mechanisms, and improve the quality and ability of grassroots cadres. Only in this way can we truly achieve victory in the anti-corruption struggle and enable the masses of the people to truly enjoy the benefits and fruits brought about by the anti-corruption struggle.

In short, this incident is not only an isolated incident, but also a profound reflection on the current supervision of power at the grassroots level and the anti-corruption struggle. We need to draw a lesson from this incident and strengthen the building of a mechanism for supervising and restraining grassroots cadres, so that the masses of the people can truly enjoy the benefits and fruits of the anti-corruption struggle. Only in this way can we truly achieve social justice and fairness and make the lives of the people more beautiful and happy.

Related Pages