Biden ordered airstrikes on Iraq and Syria in response to the recent attack on US military bases in Jordan. However, the timing of the retaliation sparked controversy and led to anger among Iraqi and Syrian populations. At the same time, some Americans are unhappy with Biden's decision. The incident raises a series of questions: Was Biden's actions justified? Is America's role in the Middle East still credible? How should we view this attack and its possible consequences? First, let's take a look at why Biden chose to retaliate at this time. According to the report, Biden said that he ordered the airstrike as soon as he learned of the attack, but the actual operation was delayed. This has raised questions from some that Biden is hesitant to deal with the issue. In addition, some observers believe that Biden's actions are motivated by political considerations, and he hopes to show his concern for the safety of the U.S. team and send a tough message to domestic voters.
Whatever Biden's motives, however, the retaliation did provoke outrage in Iraq and Syria. The Iraqi military condemned the U.S. airstrikes as a violation of Iraq's sovereignty and said they had not been notified in advance. This incident has further exacerbated the dissatisfaction of the Iraqi people with the existence of the US ** team and also raised questions about the role of the United States in the Middle East. In fact, the United States has long appeared on the international stage as a warmonger. Whether it is the war in Iraq or Afghanistan, the United States has threatened to use force at every turn, and this has aroused widespread condemnation from the international community. This retaliation is also a spillover effect of U.S. support for Israel, which has been unconditionally supporting Israel's actions, leading to instability in the Middle East. So, what should we make of this attack and its possible consequences? First, we need to recognize that retaliation will only exacerbate the conflict, not solve the problem.
Past experience has taught us that wars often lead only to more destruction and human beings, rather than to promote peace. In addition, we need to re-examine whether the role of the United States in the Middle East is really to promote peace and stability, or simply to protect its own interests. Finally, we need to pay more attention to the voices and aspirations of people in the Middle East. They are the ones who are truly affected by war and conflict, and they want peace and stability, not constant war. We should listen to their voices, respect their wishes and seek ways to resolve the issue through dialogue and negotiation. In short, Biden's retaliation sparked anger in Iraq and Syria, as well as the displeasure of some Americans. This attack once again makes us think about the role of the United States in the Middle East and its contribution to peace and stability. We need to seek a way to resolve the issue through dialogue and negotiation, rather than continuing to use force. Only in this way can we bring real peace and stability to the Middle East region.
The situation in the Middle East has been in the spotlight, especially the relationship between the United States and Israel. Recently, Biden**'s policy toward Israel has sparked a series of controversies. On the one hand, their conniving and abetting stance on Israel has made Israel unscrupulous. However, when the US ** base was attacked, the United States carried out retaliatory actions, but it once again triggered a new round of attacks, forming a vicious circle. This situation illustrates the problem: the U.S. presence in Iraq has become untenable. The presence of U.S. troops in Iraq has sparked many controversies and conflicts, but Biden seems powerless to address the issue. Perhaps because of his age and sluggishness, his decision-making and problem perception have been affected to a certain extent. So, how should Biden respond to such a situation? First of all, he needs to realize as soon as possible that the US military presence in the Middle East has become a huge burden.
Instead of achieving stability and peace, it has exacerbated tensions in the region. Therefore, Biden should consider withdrawing from Iraq in order to avoid further conflict and **. Second, Biden needs to examine his own policies, especially his stance on Israel. He should make it clear that the United States will not turn a blind eye to Israel's excesses and will not condone their military actions. Stability and peace in the Middle East can be achieved only through a just and balanced policy. At the same time, Biden should also strengthen diplomatic relations with other Middle Eastern countries. Instead of relying too much on Israel, it is better to have more cooperation and friendly relations with other countries. In this way, it will not only reduce dependence on Israel, but also create a more stable pattern in the Middle East. In addition, Biden can also draw some lessons from history. Over the past few decades, the United States has tried to intervene militarily to solve the problems of the Middle East, but the results have often backfired.
Therefore, Biden should focus more on diplomatic and political means than on military means. In conclusion, the situation in the Middle East is complex and sensitive and needs to be handled with caution. Biden should revisit his policies and take a more sensible and pragmatic stance on the Middle East. Only in this way can real stability and peace be brought to the Middle East region.