Recently, a traffic dispute incident has attracted widespread attention on social **. It is reported that a Mercedes-Benz owner had an argument with others in Xu Wen, Guangdong, because of the order of passage, smashed the car and insulted the other party in an emotional out-of-control manner, and was finally administratively detained for 10 days and fined 500 yuan in accordance with the law. This incident not only sparked a discussion about road civilization, but also caused a controversy over the cost of vehicle damage assessment.
According to the information circulating on the Internet, the Chery 4S store involved in the incident issued a damage assessment fee of 5,200 yuan for the damaged hood. This figure quickly caused heated discussions among netizens, with many questioning the high cost and believing that the 4S store may have played a role in the incident. However, the truth of the matter is unknown to the outside world.
In order to clarify the facts, Beiqing Daily called Chery's customer service on February 2 to seek an official response. Chery's customer service said that the cost of damage assessment is usually determined by the insurance company on a case-by-case basis, and they have not received any information registration about the 5,200 yuan loss assessment fee. The customer service staff called on the public not to believe rumors, and should treat such traffic disputes rationally to avoid unnecessary social impact.
Ping An Xuwen's previous report mentioned that the two cars had a dispute over the order of passage, but it was not clear which side was plugging the other party. Mercedes-Benz owner Wang's actions — stopping the car and smashing the hood of the white car with his fist — have violated the relevant laws and regulations, and have therefore been punished accordingly. In response to the fact that the net legend Rui 4S store assessed the damage of 5,200 yuan to the hood, it aroused widespread questions and discussions. This loss assessment amount is considered to be too high, and some netizens question whether there is a possibility of unreasonable loss assessment. This kind of questioning has sparked heated discussions and further deepened the complexity of the incident. In the face of questions spread on the Internet, Chery's customer service responded and appealed. "The specific cost is the insurance company's loss assessment, and the information registration of 5,200 yuan has not been received," Chery's customer service said. They called on everyone not to believe rumors, to deal rationally with traffic disputes, to avoid the spread of false information, and to jointly maintain good social order. The previous Ping An Xu Wen report did not elaborate on the specific reasons for the dispute, but simply pointed out that the dispute was caused by "traffic order issues". Such a statement makes the truth of the incident more confusing, and at the same time stimulates speculation and discussion about the inside story of the incident. As for the interpretation of the cause of the dispute in the Ping An Xu Wen report, more information and evidence are still needed to analyze.
This incident reminds the majority of car owners that they should remain calm and restrained during driving, abide by traffic rules, respect others, and jointly maintain good road traffic order. Follow-up matters such as vehicle maintenance and damage assessment should also be resolved through formal channels to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and disputes.
With the development of society and the advancement of technology, vehicles have become an indispensable part of people's daily life. The ensuing traffic disputes and vehicle maintenance problems also require us to pay more attention and deal with them rationally. It is hoped that through this incident, more people can reflect on it, promote the progress of traffic civilization, and make our roads safer and more harmonious.