The ancients said: "Who is without fault? After that, it can be changed, and it is very good. Although the original intention of the ancients was to hope that people could give people who made mistakes a chance, some people who made mistakes did not have a sense of self-reflection at all, and they would only feel that the other party was deliberately looking for trouble when they corrected others, and this arrogant and arrogant attitude was simply unreasonable.
Ms. Wang from Nanjing, Jiangsu Province met this kind of person in her life, not only causing Ms. Wang to be in danger and almost encountering the danger of her life, but also shouting afterwards, saying that it was just a trivial matter, just make a fuss that the strange person did not die.
That arrogant and domineering attitude almost pointed at Ms. Wang's nose and said: "It's all because you have nothing to do here, that's why I made a mistake, you just touched the porcelain in your heart, and you want me to apologize to you for compensation, I don't let you apologize to me It's already a lot of compensation, it's really annoying enough!" ”
The incident happened in an underground parking garage in a community in Nanjing, when Ms. Wang came home from work and just parked her car in the mechanical parking space, and before she could get out of the car, the elevator suddenly started and began to carry her and the car up slowly. Ms. Wang was frightened by this sudden scene, she hurriedly looked around and shouted for help, just as she saw a woman a few meters away from the car was standing in front of the lifting console and bowing her head to play with her mobile phone.
It turned out that the reason why the elevator started suddenly was not because it was malfunctioning, but because the woman randomly activated the lift button without observing whether there was anyone in the parking space. Ms. Wang was so anxious that she was sweating profusely, and shouted at the woman to stop quickly, and there were still people in the parking space who had not gotten out of the car. But the woman seemed to be deaf, unmoved by Ms. Wang's cries for help, her eyes seemed to be nailed to her mobile phone, and she didn't even raise her head.
At this time, as the car rose higher and higher, Ms. Wang's door began to deform because of the squeezing, Ms. Wang screamed loudly in fright, just when she thought that today was going to be more auspicious, the elevator stopped, and then began to descend to the ground. Because Ms. Wang was too frightened, her cry was finally noticed by the woman playing with her mobile phone next to her, and she pressed the emergency stop button.
When the car fell back to the ground, Ms. Wang's frightened mood was calmed, but what happened next made her full of anger and nowhere to vent. Although Ms. Wang was frightened, fortunately the person was fine, but the car door was damaged, so Ms. Wang approached the woman who was playing with her mobile phone to discuss compensation. Ms. Wang said that she did not ask the other party for any mental damages, but only needed to be responsible for reimbursing the door repair costs of her car.
But it was this reasonable request, but the mobile phone woman categorically refused, and even said wildly: "It's okay if the person doesn't die, if I die, I'll be responsible to the end, and it's none of my business if I don't die." After speaking, he walked away, leaving Ms. Wang trembling in place.
Since the parties are unreasonable, then go to the community property to complain. Ms. Wang felt that the lifting and lowering of the mechanical parking space in the community should be controlled by a special person, and the parking space console also specifically indicated the instructions that it was forbidden to use without professional training, so Ms. Wang felt that the property in the community had every reason to be responsible for this matter.
However, the community property said that Ms. Wang's idea was too unrealistic to be realized, because if there was a security guard on each console who was responsible for the control, then the underground parking garage would have to be equipped with hundreds of security guards, and such a manpower arrangement was completely unrealistic.
Although there is some truth in the property's claim, it is an indisputable fact that Ms. Wang's car was damaged due to improper operation by outsiders during the parking in the garage, so shouldn't the property be responsible for this matter? In response to this statement, the property responded that they have posted a safety warning on the lifting console, reminding the owners of the community that when operating the mechanical parking space, please be sure to observe whether there is someone around the mechanical parking space to pick up the car in the mechanical parking space to prevent accidents.
The attitude of the property has made it clear that they can't manage this matter and don't want to take care of it, and let Ms. Wang find the accident counterpart to take responsibility. Ms. Wang was very angry but helpless about the practice of playing leather ball with the property, so she could only continue to discuss the matter with the woman who was playing with her mobile phone at the time. Ms. Wang found her ** number from the woman's Mercedes-Benz, but she has not been able to dial it.
Faced with the neglect of the property and the woman's refusal to compensate for the accident caused by misoperation, Ms. Wang had no choice but to resolve the matter through legal means. After consulting with the corresponding lawyer, the lawyer replied to Ms. Wang's experience that on the premise that the negotiation with the property and the woman who caused the accident failed, the two parties could be sued to the court at the same time and required them to bear the corresponding liability for compensation.
Which party do you think should be more responsible, the property or the woman who caused the accident? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comment area.
**10,000 Fans Incentive Plan