7.2 billion is spent in vain again! Qualcomm announced the signing of an agreement to extend the era

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-02-15

Your attention is my accelerant, pay attention to it, learn more about finance, learn about finance, and understand finance.

A major decision by technology giants Apple and Qualcomm has attracted widespread attention and heated discussions in recent days. Apple spent $7.2 billion to acquire Intel's related business a few years ago with the goal of developing its own 5G baseband chips. However, due to the loss of technical personnel and Qualcomm's technical advantages and patent barriers in the field of 5G baseband, Apple's self-developed 5G baseband process has encountered many difficulties. Unexpectedly, Apple recently announced that it had renewed its 3-year exclusivity** agreement with Qualcomm and abandoned its plan to independently develop chips. This means that the huge amount of money spent before is seen as a waste of money. Now, Apple is not only unable to compete with Qualcomm's 5G baseband, but also needs to continue to rely on Qualcomm. Apple's inability to achieve independent and controllable baseband chips has become the focus. The main reasons for this are as follows.

1. Apple acquired Intel's baseband chip business, but the results were limited

Apple's acquisition of Intel's baseband chip business unit is to get rid of its dependence on Qualcomm and independently develop 5G baseband. However, due to Intel's weak technical strength and the massive loss of technical personnel, the acquisition did not have the desired effect. Apple buys a shell of nothingness and does not have direct access to mature technology.

Expanding: Apple's choice to acquire Intel's baseband chip business unit is due to its dissatisfaction with Qualcomm's monopoly situation and its desire for independent research and development. However, throughout the acquisition process, Apple did not fully anticipate the challenges that issues such as the departure of technical staff could bring, which also led to the subsequent dilemma. As an enterprise with certain technical strength, Intel does not have a strong position in this field. Therefore, after the acquisition, Apple did not get the expected technology and production capacity.

2. Qualcomm's technical strength and patent barriers surpass

Qualcomm has strong technical strength and abundant key patents in the field of 5G baseband. Catching up with or surpassing Qualcomm in a short period of time is an almost impossible task for Apple. Qualcomm's technological superiority and patent barriers have become obstacles that Apple cannot bypass.

Expanding: Qualcomm, as a giant in the 5G baseband field, has been leading the way for many years. They have long accumulated a wealth of technology and patents, and enjoy a high reputation in the market. This kind of technological advantage and patent barriers make it difficult for other competitors to match, and it has also become a problem that Apple cannot bypass. Even Apple, the world's leading company, will not be able to catch up in a short period of time.

3. Patent barriers and chain restrictions faced by independent research and development

Apple wants to completely develop its own 5G baseband chip, but it has encountered great difficulties in the face of Qualcomm's patent barriers. It is not feasible to get rid of the dependence on Qualcomm and seek the baseband of other leading companies (such as Huawei), and the limitations of 5G baseband chips are very obvious. Apple finds it difficult to break the limits of this ** chain.

Expansion: The independent research and development of 5G baseband chips is undoubtedly facing huge challenges, of which patent barriers are an important aspect. Qualcomm, as a patent giant in this field, almost monopolizes most of the key patents in the market. If Apple intends to develop its own patents, it will have to circumvent Qualcomm's patents. However, this task is almost impossible. In addition, the particularity of the 5G baseband chip also determines that Apple cannot choose other leading companies. After all, not every manufacturer has the ability and strength to support the development and production of 5G baseband.

To sum up, Apple's signing of a 3-year exclusive ** agreement with Qualcomm and the abandonment of the plan to independently develop chips are the result of Apple's constraints in many aspects such as technical strength, patent barriers and ** chain restrictions. Although Apple once acquired Intel's baseband chip business, due to the loss of technical personnel and the existence of Qualcomm's technical strength, it was unable to achieve independent and controllable baseband chips. The challenges facing Apple are enormous, but they also teach us something about how to stay competitive in tech if you keep trying to catch up. For enterprises, it is crucial to find their own development path and pay attention to the accumulation of technology and the improvement of innovation capabilities.

In the future, whether Apple can break Qualcomm's exclusive ** situation and realize independent and controllable 5G baseband chips still needs to be tested by time. However, in the short term, achieving this goal is almost impossible. Apple needs to reflect deeply, and there is still a long way to go in the accumulation of chip technology. At the same time, the rapid development of 5G technology also reminds us that behind the competition in the technology industry is the gap between technological strength and innovation ability. Only by continuously strengthening R&D and engineering capabilities can we remain invincible in the fierce competition. Although Apple suffered defeat in this battle, it does not mean that they cannot continue to try. In the future, Apple still has opportunities and challenges, and I look forward to them continuing to improve and achieve their goals.

If you like it, you can follow me, share financial advice regularly, and talk to you about financial topics.

Related Pages