Recently, a question has been asked on the Internet, that is, can Japan continue to be a soldier? To this, I have a very direct answer: if Japan really does that, China, North Korea, and Russia will be finished, haha. These people are eager to beat Japan to the ground.
The United States, South Korea and other countries are naturally happy to see it, and finally one person stood up and challenged Japan and Russia, willing to play for Ukraine. It can be said that this is a "win-win" situation.
To develop the military, the first premise is to have sufficient strength.
To give you an example, you can see Israel, which has also embarked on the path of militarization. The only difference is their military prowess.
In the Showa era, Japan was called a reckless militarist, while Israel called it "culinary militarism."
If Japan wants to embark on the path of militarism, then their first condition is that they do not have enough force. Japan's current Self-Defense Forces, let alone fighting against China, North Korea, and Russia, are a powerful army, and they will not end well. If you take it out and match it with South Korea, it is estimated that it will also be the best share.
Yes, South Korea's military system and military power are really terrible. Even in the absence of enough food, even North Korean servicemen can make fun of the food of the South Korean troops. However, their arms production is still very high. At present, South Korea is the largest traditional arms dealer of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Japan, on the other hand, does not have such capabilities.
Japan looks strong on the surface, but in reality it is a very tight country, and as soon as there is no United States, they will be eliminated. Although Japan can manufacture more advanced and more advanced products, it does not have any core technology, whether in China or in major universities, there is no research in this area.
Not only is Japan reluctant to invest, but the United States will also interfere with it. As soon as Japan has the idea of conducting its own research, the United States will immediately come up with a more advanced and cheaper alternative than theirs.
In terms of force, there is no need for any country to embark on the path of militarism. At present, it is mainly American politicians who are shouting the "theory of war" in Japan, led by Fumio Kishida. Japan is ostensibly militaristic, but in reality it is a pawn of the Americans.
In fact, with the exception of some politicians who pin their interests on the United States, Japan does not want a direct confrontation with China. It's like Japan "mothballed" the commander of a division under the Yellow Sea.
A Japanese Black Hawk, which was supposed to be an officer of a whole army, ended up falling into the sea because the driver accidentally turned off the engine.
Chinese netizens have said that China did this, and the United States is fanning the flames, wanting Japan to use this incident as a reason to go to war with China. But Japan** came forward to deny that it was just an accident and had nothing to do with China.
As the saying goes, people have to bow their heads under the eaves, and people under the eaves have to bow their heads. In the case of your strength, even if the enemy loses a division commander, it is only a misunderstanding.
And in order to realize militarism, in addition to the use of force, it is necessary to meet several requirements, the first is to implement a complete **, without which the Americans are the emperors of Japan.
Next, there is the strict ** control. Japan does not have this, such as TEPCO, they can do whatever they want, they only care about economic interests, and they do not care about national policies.
Third, it is necessary to organically integrate the concepts of patriotism, national consciousness, and hatred to form a kind of grassroots education. Perhaps, this is the most suitable thing for Japan to do at the moment, and it is also the most suitable thing for war.
But if there is only one condition, it is the same reckless militarism as Israel.
If Japan were used, would there be a war? Okay, but Russia will definitely be happy, and Chinese netizens will be happy. It's a natural nationalism. If they start a war of aggression, then the attacked side has the right means to fight back.
Moreover, Japan's strength is not very good, and it is very likely that it will be Ukraine in East Asia. After this war is over, whether Japan still has the possibility of surviving is another question.
Therefore, such militarism does not pose any threat to China at all.