At the door of the theater, a mother asks her child: What would you do if you were beaten by four male classmates? At this moment, I suddenly understood that Article 20 is fascinating not only because of the frequent jokes, but also because it touches on important issues in our lives. What do we do when a child is being bullied? How do we respond when a family member is insulted? And where should we stand when we witness violence? These scenes that once made us feel at a loss, but the answer is given in the movie.
In the film, when Han Yuchen acted bravely, he fell into the quagmire of the law. He broke the bridge of the bullie's nose and faced security detention for minor injuries. There are two key points in this: first, the bullying scene is a blind spot for monitoring, and there is a lack of evidence to support it; Second, the injuries were minor and did not constitute a criminal offence. This has led me to think about what is right, especially in real life, and how often we choose to sit on the sidelines for fear of being punished.
At the same time, a trivia is mentioned in the film: when it comes to facial injuries, it is difficult to constitute a minor injury with just one blow. In another case, bus driver Zhang Guisheng was also sentenced to three years in prison for being hit in the vital role, which brings us more reflection. How to treat righteous and courageous acts fairly, and how to protect oneself without excessively harming the other party, are all questions that require us to think deeply.
In addition, the movie also shows that the victim is afraid to stand up and testify. In the case of Wang Yongqiang's counter-murder of the village tyrant, the villagers collectively remained silent, and this learned helplessness led to the distortion of justice. Through this plot, the film shows us the plight faced by the victims, as well as the society's attitude towards justice.
The most impressive thing is that the film's interpretation of Article 20 of the Criminal Law triggers in-depth thinking about legitimate defense. Considering the overall risk, not just whether the infringement has stopped, gives us a whole new perspective. In real life, whether we can properly understand and apply the provisions of the law, and how to protect ourselves and others in the face of danger, are all questions that we need to think about.
To sum up, "Article 20" is not only an entertainment work, but also a thought-provoking film. It raises many questions about justice, courage and law, and provokes the audience to think about social realities. I hope that the audience can think deeply about these issues while watching the movie, and face the challenges in life with a more rational and mature attitude. Finally, I would like to ask you, after watching the movie, do you have a new understanding of righteousness and righteousness?