In our country, there is a saying that "hard work makes people rich".
Although this is not absolute, hard-working people are always respected.
Industrious people don't live too badly.
Industriousness has always been a traditional virtue of the Chinese nation, but this virtue has become something that leads them to scorn in Tokelau.
There is no other reason for this, it is that people in their country are too lazy.
While other countries would like to be sovereign and independent, Tokelau is well placed and resolutely opposes independence.
I just want to be lazy all day long and live a life of relying on aid from other countries.
1. Interesting Tokelau
New Zealand is the happiest country in the world, and many people aspire to live in New Zealand.
However, in this ideal country, there is a particularly "lazy" country that governs, and that country is Tokelau.
Legally, Tokelau was administered by New Zealand, but the country had autonomy.
On the surface, it is under the administration of New Zealand, but it has little practical significance.
The reason for this distribution was, at best, to protect Tokelau.
And this protection is mainly embodied in receiving social assistance.
New Zealand and a number of other institutions and countries had been assisting Tokelau in terms of resources and economy.
In that way, Tokelau would not be too poor and backward.
In order to make Tokelau better, New Zealand had drawn up a feasible development plan for it, and if it was implemented carefully, the country could get rid of poverty and become rich.
However, Tokelau's administrators and people did not like New Zealand's good intentions, but chose to live a bad life.
They only accept assistance from others and do not accept projects or projects that require them to work.
For a long time, New Zealand has given too much in return for nothing, but still insisted on giving Tokelau the aid to the queen, and it is difficult to imagine why New Zealand would do so.
Is Tokelau backward and poor?
Since Tokelau is a lazy country, is it really backward and poor?
In our consciousness, lazy people will be poor, and lazy countries will not be good enough.
However, when we really understand Tokelau, we find that we are superficial, and Tokelau is far more comfortable than we imagined.
Today, the people of Tokelau live a daily life of eating, playing, resting when tired, and occasionally fishing.
After resting, get up and eat, bask in the sun after eating, and enjoy the scenery of the natural year.
It's a very pleasant life.
Not to mention, there are really people who envy such a life.
Initially an archipelago, Tokelau was taken over by New Zealand in 1925.
New Zealand is like its parents, feeding him and drinking, and even if Tokelau is no longer angry, New Zealand has never given up on it.
Tokelau relied on its excellent geographical location and the people were not living badly.
They have a lot of seafood there, which has become their economy.
Accustomed to this comfortable life, and because New Zealand was always helping them, the people of Tokelau were not self-motivated, and as long as they could eat and drink enough and not think about anything else, they simply left it to the table.
What is the economic situation in Tokelau?
Although the people of Tokelau were not poor, its economy was still very backward.
After all, the people who live here are so lazy and never enterprising, even the tourism equipment built in New Zealand can be abandoned, and they can be rich enough to go to the **?
On Tokelau, where land is at a bottleneck, the only food that can be obtained is seafood, coconut and other food, and stamps and commemorative coins have become the country's main economy**.
In fact, if it is well developed, Tokelau can be developed through tourism.
It's a pity that they are too lazy, so the development of tourism is not very optimistic.
It is precisely because of Tokelau's lazy thinking that the country's economy is relatively backward.
New Zealand has done its best to help them, but it has had little impact.
Perhaps accustomed to the aid of New Zealand and the United Nations, the people of Tokelau simply chose to be rotten and even less concerned about their own development.
In addition to New Zealand and the United Nations, the WHO, the United Nations Children**, the Commonwealth Youth Development Programme and other agencies will lend a helping hand to Tokelau.
Conclusion:
It is said that crying children have milk to eat, and it seems that Tokelau is a typical crying child.
As a "parent", New Zealand seemed unlikely to let it go, and with the assistance of various human rights organizations around the world, Tokelau had become accustomed to the "handouts" of others.
If you want them to stop being lazy and say goodbye to "rotten", it seems that there is still a long way to go! We must not learn from Tokelau, only by hard work can life have goals, life will be meaningful, and the country will be richer and stronger.