Introduction: In the 50s of the 20th century, China's rural areas began a comprehensive land reform and agricultural cooperativeization movement. **As Minister of Rural Affairs, he is responsible for carrying out this important work. However, in 1955, he had a serious disagreement with *** about the pace of development of rural cooperatives. After a long debate, **criticized*** like a woman with small feet", this incident has sparked widespread attention and discussion.
In 1953, the Resolution on Mutual Assistance and Cooperation in Agricultural Production was promulgated, and it was decided to promote the development of agricultural cooperatives. At the same time, he expressed the hope that the pace of rural cooperatives would be accelerated. With the support of decision-making, rural cooperatives have developed rapidly. By the end of 1954, there were already 970,000 cooperatives. **Satisfied with this and plans to further accelerate the pace of development.
However, some concerns have been raised about the plan. In his view, too rapid development could lead to instability in policy implementation and various problems. Therefore, we insisted on steadily promoting the development of cooperatives according to the original plan. This was contrary to ***'s assumption, and the two started a long argument and discussion. But in the end, they failed to agree.
After arguing, after ** returned home, his wife Chen Lan advised him to talk less and not to collide with ***. However, ** insisted that as the specific person in charge of this work, he had a responsibility to tell ** the truth. On July 31, 1955, ** presided over the meeting and made a report on "On the Question of Agricultural Cooperatives". In the report, ** harshly criticized *** without naming him, calling him "like a woman with small feet". This criticism put a lot of pressure on *** and was forced to review it at the meeting.
In the wake of the criticism, the pace of development of rural cooperatives has accelerated, but at the same time many problems have arisen. Due to the rapid development, many cooperatives were chaotic in management, the interests of farmers were violated, and a series of disasters were caused. Eventually, the tragedy led to the decision to re-investigate and take back responsibility, and it was not until 1960 that he returned to the mountain.
Although there are some problems in the development process of rural cooperatives, they have always insisted on truthfully reflecting the situation to the community and conscientiously performing their responsibilities in the whole process. In 1960, it was decided to reappoint*** and publicly praise his work at a meeting to vindicate his grievances.
Conclusion: The controversy over the pace of development of rural cooperatives and the criticism of him became an important event in history. This incident not only reflects the urgent desire for the rapid advancement of socialist construction, but also highlights the courage and sense of responsibility of the company to adhere to its own opinions. This controversy and criticism has had a far-reaching impact on the course of China's socialist construction, and it is also worthy of our deep consideration today. It was once said, "No investigation, no voice", a phrase that applies not only to those times, but also to us today. In any decision-making and controversy, objectivity, truthfulness, adherence to principles and responsibility are the principles and guidelines that we need to always adhere to in our work.