According to the previous college entrance examination timeline, it is currently the second round of review stage, if the first round of review is regarded as laying the foundation, and the third round of review is a sprint, the second round of review is undoubtedly the stage of improvement. In other words, how high a score can be scored in the college entrance examination has been basically finalized in the second round of review, and it is difficult to greatly improve in the third round of review. So, in the second round of review, what should be done to improve quickly and widen the gap with other students?
1. Consolidate weak knowledge points
In the second round of review, the teacher will not lead us to sort out the knowledge points in the textbook one by one, but highlight the training of the test points and key question types, and review in the form of special topics.
Since each of us has a different degree of mastery of each knowledge point and question type, you are very familiar with this knowledge point and question type, but your understanding of that knowledge point and question type is very weak, and other students are just the opposite. Therefore, in the second round of review, each of us must find out our weaknesses and shortcomings.
On the one hand, you can return to the textbook and check each knowledge point and question type one by one; On the other hand, you can sort out the wrong questions in your usual practice and exams, and classify the knowledge points and question types that you have made mistakes. After finding out the weaknesses and shortcomings, ask classmates and teachers to clarify the problems, and then do some special training to break them down.
2. Strengthen tandem capabilities
Grasp the intrinsic connection between knowledge, and string together fragmented related knowledge to form a whole. Textbook knowledge points are like scattered stacked pearls, difficult to grasp, but as long as you find a thread to string it together, it becomes a necklace, which can be easily brought up. In learning, the questions that run through the front and back are the lines, and the relevant knowledge is the pearls. In the second round of review stage, we need to find not only pearls, but also the ability to string these pearls together, we must find and think about the relevant problems that can connect the knowledge before and after, so that the more questions we think, the more comprehensive the angle of the textbook, the more accurate the grasp of the knowledge points, and the more comprehensive the thinking about the problem.
3. Improve the efficiency of brushing questions
During the second round of review, many students have already turned on the "sea of questions" mode, which is what we usually call the "crazy brushing" mode. Brushing questions is an important way to consolidate knowledge points and improve ability, but many students brush a lot of questions, and the knowledge points have not been consolidated, and their ability has not been improved, and they are still standing still, why is this?
In fact, this is mainly because the "sea of questions tactics" is opened in the wrong way, resulting in low efficiency in brushing questions. When brushing questions, we should not only pay attention to the quantity of brushes, but also pay attention to the quality of brushes. Every time you do a question, you should have the effect of a question, you should know what the knowledge points it examines, what the answering ideas and skills are, and whether there are other ways to solve the problem. If the quality is improved, we will soon be able to achieve a breakthrough from quantitative to qualitative change.
Fourth, reflect on the wrong questions
The college entrance examination is getting closer and closer, and there are more and more exams to face with it. In many exams, whether it is a strong subject or a weak subject, we always have questions that we get wrong. A careful analysis of these questions will show that each time the exam is wrong, it is the same type of question or the same knowledge point. Why is that?
In fact, this is mainly because we did not seriously do the analysis of the exam and reflect on the wrong questions. The wrong questions are all our weak knowledge points, and if the weak knowledge points are not analyzed and reflected, a wrong mindset will be formed. Every time there is an exam, the mindset of the wrong questions will be prioritized, resulting in some questions being wrong again and again. Therefore, we must take every mistake seriously, find the reason for the error, and then overcome it in a targeted manner.