The Independence of Texas Economic Implications and International Situation
When we discuss the international situation and the fate of the country, we all like to talk about the so-called national fate. Now, the fate of our country has come. Does it come from? Cracks from the United States. The United States is about to kick off, and the world is watching closely, which is bound to become a topic of conversation. Unexpectedly, the United States has not yet begun, and cracks have already appeared within the United States. If internal worries are not handled well, external troubles will only exacerbate internal worries.
Now that the United States is facing the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and is beginning to pit its own people against its own people, the reaction of China and Russia to the loss of control of Texas is very complicated, and if Texas becomes independent, what does it mean?
Previously, we always thought that if the United States fell, like a wall fell, it would be pushed down by external forces. What we don't realize is that the decline of the United States will begin from within: the United States is, after all, a federal state that unites many states into one great power. It is different from China, which is why there is a direct confrontation between Texas and the US Federation. Civil strife broke out.
In the past, the United States always liked to say that its own system was very perfect, and it would become much more advanced than the existing separation of powers. It is precisely because of the internal disunity of the United States that there will be frequent confrontations between the continents and the Federation. Many people believe that this conflict between Texas and the federal ** is due to federal** dissatisfaction with U.S. immigration policy, or partisanship. This is not the case.
In a word, the United States is now in decline. Federalism, why do these so-called states make up a big country? It's not because the federation has brought tangible benefits to these continents. The fundamental reason why the United States has been able to maintain stability is that it creates wealth and then divides the spoils. If property is not evenly distributed, discontent will inevitably arise among the continents, and the continents will be relatively independent, which will lead to various contradictions, and then blood feuds.
The American Dream is a quote from the last century that says that the United States can help you achieve your dreams, that the United States can accept everyone unconditionally, and that no talent will be buried. But are these people going to the United States with the idea of building America? Of course not, they just go for their dreams and interests. If one day, the United States faces a common foreign enemy, but there is no competing interests, then these continents will certainly not be willing to fight with the Federation against foreign enemies.
Now, the problem for the United States is that there are not so many resources to plunder or encroach upon, which means that the American federal government can no longer create such huge wealth, not to mention that the American federal government has been resisting China's **, which is clearly cutting off the wealth of other continents**. Are other continents willing to do the same? Of course not. In the past, we played along because the Federation had meat, but now the Federation not only has no meat, but even wants to snatch the meat from our bowls, who wants to play with it? In fact, the contradiction between the two is like a landlord whose family is poor, and the people who work for him will naturally run away.
The attitude of our country and Russia towards the current predicament of the United States is also different. In the case of Russia, their attitude is even more blatant, on the Russian **, although it is not said which side they support, they have already called Texas the People's Republic of Texas, which is full of braggart. In fact, long before Russia, when the Soviet Union was in power, Gorbachev said that the United States would eventually come to the same end as the Soviet Union and fall apart.
Gorbachev's argument is not unreasonable. The Soviet Union did emulate the United States, partly to be able to create a community, but these countries were all brought together for temporary benefits that, if unevenly distributed, were doomed to conflict. There is no sense of unity in these states at all. This is different from us because we believe that we are one, sharing weal and woe, weal and woe, and supporting one side in times of difficulty, which the so-called United Nations cannot do.
As a matter of fact, the situation that the United States is now facing has some benefits for Russia and China. First and foremost, if there is an internal problem in the United States, the United States will not have the courage to continue to put pressure on Russia, and China will be able to obstruct it at will as before, because China's blockade of China is also obstructing the national interests of the United States. If you want everyone to have meat to eat, you have to take everyone to plunder, or give everyone a chance to negotiate with the people, if the people have no meat to eat, rebellion is inevitable.
The crisis of the enemy is our opportunity, and our country will certainly not resign itself to degenerating; We love peace, and we just want to use this opportunity to develop well.