The mainland no longer tolerates data leakage and has started anti-dumping review!
Text: Dog Tricks.
Since Europe launched a counter-investigation of American automobiles and three Chinese companies were included in the "watch list", China** has obstructed it several times on the grounds of "not abiding by market rules".
The unvetted automakers also said, "We want a fair market." "However, the way the three companies handled the case was a bit unexpected.
This is due to the fact that they have all taken the initiative to submit important information to Europe** and have also shown a considerable degree of cooperation in European regulation. One also made it clear that they would do whatever it took to enter Europe. Contrary to the views of the opposition parties, the behavior of some companies made this evaluation more difficult.
In the face of the trend of international economic integration, actively carry out data transmission, so as to get rid of the control of the European Union, which is conducive to the further development of the European economy. But the essence of the law of the market is to undermine the law of injustice. It's like the American company Ford was forced to negotiate many times under the pressure of the workers' federation and finally reached an agreement, and our company knew that it was unjust, but still bravely handed over the information.
Fortunately, when they went to the factory, the European ** once again stood up to stop this practice.
According to the published data, Tesla, BMW, and other cars are all made in the mainland, and they were not included in the survey because the sampling targets were too large, and this "subsidy" investigation did not show any basis, and the investigation was carried out only on speculation, which is contrary to the relevant regulations of the WTO. Therefore, the Mainland has put forward the obligation to submit the relevant information.
The meaning of this sentence is clear: as long as you can produce solid evidence, we will not stop your investigation. Such a gesture is enough to show that Europe's investigation of the EU is no longer tolerable.
The authors of the article point out that this further tightens the European Union's detection"neck"γ
First, there are no tangible signs from the European Union yet. In fact, there is no evidence. How this number is called"Dumping"The reason is that China only accounts for 8% of electric vehicles in Europe? It is true that China's electric vehicles are lower than some European car companies, but there is no such thing"Dumping"γ
Our point of view is that if they can't produce any evidence, then we have to prove it with facts, and that is what constitutes it"Illegal"γAt such times, the situation is reversed, and their duty of impartiality is likely to be reviewed.
Second, if our attitude becomes tough again, it means that there will be no good outcome to this case without a good situation.
In particular, we also have some actions in the anti-dumping case of "Cognac". At that time, the French side confirmed the matter and asked about the relationship between the case and the European Countervailing Tariff Act. They were very dissatisfied with this because of the problem of the "hammer", and they were afraid to involve the investigation method.
Analysts say this may be just the beginning of an antitrust action, and that Europeans will face more dilemmas if they continue to target their investigations at unfair competition. So the author believes that the opposition to this issue in the interior of Europe is partly stuck"neck"Above.
What do you think about this? So, will Europe give up? Especially when it is also involved in the race with the United States for subsidies for electric vehicles, will Europe turn the first degree?
Welcome to leave a message, like, share!