After the monthly exam, the head teacher screened out the top students and the scumbags to be treated differently, is it reasonable to "hierarchical teaching"?
In today's society, parents are full of concern about their children's studies, and generally believe that modern children lack the happiness of the past, and parents lack understanding for their children, overemphasize their studies, and frequently report to various tutoring classes. This is essentially a desire for children's future education and access to good educational resources, especially in today's competitive educational environment, where it is not easy for children to make a difference.
Parents are worried about their children's junior high school entrance examination in order to enter junior high school in elementary school, and they are anxious about entering college entrance examination when they enter high school. At each stage, children are expected to be able to attend the best schools to increase their chances of getting into a good university. However, the operation of some teachers has made parents feel uneasy, and even if their children are admitted to prestigious schools, they may face unfair treatment.
For example, at the beginning of junior high school, there is often a placement test to give students an idea of their level in school and class, and for teachers to get an idea of what students are capable of. However, some teachers set up separate groups for the top 20 students after the first monthly exam for focused training. What do I think about this?
Recently, I talked to a colleague about her son's teacher's operation when he first entered junior high school, and it was jaw-dropping. Under the long-term supervision of his colleagues, his son was successfully admitted to a key middle school, which is known for its strict management. From the beginning of the school year, the class teacher announces the students' academic performance in school in the class group every day, which exacerbates the anxiety of parents. The upcoming first monthly exam makes parents even more nervous. However, after the results of the monthly exam were announced, the colleague's son was ranked 14th in the class, although it was not the top, but the colleague was still satisfied.
Soon after, the head teacher notified the parents of the first 20 students to hold a parent-teacher conference, saying that these students were the focus of the class. They are grouped into separate groups to receive study materials and assignments. Obviously, there is a clear difference in the treatment of these students and other students.
When she first heard the news, her colleague was glad that her son was in the top 20, but she soon began to reflect: if the next exam score is not satisfactory, will her son be defined as a "scumbag"? Is it reasonable to divide students into different levels? This led me to think about whether "hierarchical teaching" should be adopted in the compulsory education stage.
Tiered teaching is not uncommon in modern education, and it is considered to be a method of teaching students according to their aptitude, using different teaching modes according to their learning ability. This is beneficial for a subset of students and is able to meet the learning needs of different students. However, some parents are against this, arguing that students should enjoy the same resources in the same class and that teachers should not treat them differently so as not to hurt students' self-esteem.
In my opinion, tiered teaching is theoretically beneficial for students, but parents' concerns should not be ignored. The key lies in the correct application by the teacher. Instead of simply dividing students into three, six, nine, etc., it is better to adopt differentiated teaching and adjust the teaching plan in real time according to the actual performance of students. Students should not be viewed with colored glasses, and students should not only focus on grades and ignore the potential of poor students. The original intention of hierarchical teaching is to promote the development of individual differences of students, rather than deliberately segregating students.
Therefore, I believe that it is necessary to adopt hierarchical teaching in the compulsory education stage, but the premise is that it should be applied scientifically and reasonably, and the individual differences of students should be fully considered to implement differentiated teaching. In this way, we can really achieve the effect of improving the overall level of students.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.