Introduction:Li ChangpingMr. expressed in his article aboutRuralThe confusion of service organization and service socialization. In accordance with the provisions of the Constitution,RuralThe basic management system should be made up ofCollective economic organizationProvision of services to every family, but in practice, the ** sector has always tended to socialize services. This shift has led to a monopoly of services by a small number of people and the promotion of the service to the highest levelFarmersbecame a weak market entity, and at the same time weakenedCollective economic organizationservice features. Li ChangpingMr. raised two puzzles: why does the ** department keep promoting service socialization instead of service organization? If service socialization replaces service organization, will grassroots self-government and rural governance be abolished, and will it be feasible to rely on state finance to maintain rural governance? These two issues will be covered in depth below**.
Li ChangpingHe believes that the way out for the development of thousands of highly dispersed smallholder farmers lies in the organization of services, that is, through strengtheningCollective economic organizationProvide unified services for farmersFarmersand the subjectivity of the collective. He thinks it isFarmersand collectivelyMarket economyThe fundamental guarantee for survival and development under these conditions. However, the first department has long insisted on the socialization of services, resulting in the monopoly of services by a small number of people, and the services are continuousFarmersIncreasingly becoming a vulnerable group in the market. At the same time,Collective economic organizationThe service function has also gradually weakened, and the status of the collective has gradually declined.
Re-depiction:Li ChangpingMr. describes the contrast and conflict between the organization of services and the socialization of services. He does this by revealingFarmersand collective actionRuralEconomyThe dilemma of the survival and development of the main body puts forward the importance of service organization. In his description, we can feel itFarmersIn the market, it does not rise but falls, as wellCollective economic organizationThe gradual decline of service functionality. His point of view gives us a deep thought about why we are paying attention to itFarmersAt the same time, they have been promoting the socialization of services, rather than supporting the organization of services? This sparked our desire to beRuralReflection and discussion on the development model.
Li ChangpingHe further emphasized the importance of service organization. He thinksRuralThe basic governance body is:FarmersVillage community organization and service organization are the basic contents of rural governanceEconomy**。If the socialization of services replaces the organization of services, it is equivalent to abolishing grassroots autonomy and rural governance, and relying on state finance to ensure the viability of rural governance. However, there are more than 500,000 villages in the country, and can they maintain rural governance by relying solely on state financial support?
Re-depiction:Li ChangpingMr. emphasized the organization of servicesRuralThe meaning and role of development. He pointed outFarmersVillage community organization asRuralThe importance of basic governance subjects, and the organization of services as the cornerstone of rural governance. In his description, we can see that service organization is not only a necessary part of rural governance, but alsoEconomySupport for development. He raised a key question: if the organization of services was abolished, he would beRuralWill it lose the capacity of grassroots self-government and rural governance? Can the more than 500,000 villages in the country rely solely on state finance to ensure the smooth progress of rural governance?
By readingLi ChangpingSir's point of view, I'm rightRuralThere is a deeper understanding of the issue of service organization and service socialization. In my opinion,RuralThe development is inseparable from the organization of services, through strengtheningCollective economic organizationThe service function can be improvedFarmersof bargaining power, increasedFarmersincome. Service organization is also the basic content of rural governance, which maintains grassroots autonomy and harmonyRuralThe interests of the community. However, in the actual implementation process, it is necessary to ensure the feasibility and efficiency of service organization, and avoid the service being monopolized and excessively high. Listen to itFarmersThe need to strengthen the guidance and supervision of the service organization policy to ensureFarmersand the rights and interests of the collective are safeguarded.
In the end, I think it's not just about thatRuralEconomyand social, also involvedFarmersof survival and development issues. **Departments should pay more attentionRuralDevelopment, adhere to the concept of service organization, forFarmersProvide better service and support. FarmersWe should also strengthen our organization and actively participate in itRuralGovernance andEconomydevelopment, strive for more voice and benefit returns. Only**、Farmersand collective joint efforts to achieve thisRuralsustainable development and social progress.