Why don't peasant households give priority to the transfer of contracted land back to the village collective?This question has been bothering me for a long time. With the continuous development of labor, more and more farmers find that planting a few acres of contracted land is not as cost-effective as going out to work. Due to the rise in the labor force, farmers can only rely onLeft-behind elderlyCome and farm. However,Left-behind elderlyThey can only plant a little bit of land to maintain self-sufficiency, and more land has to be transferred or abandoned. The 5-6 acres of land contracted by each family are divided into 8-9 plots, some of which are transferred, some are not, and some are abandoned. As a result, the circulating land has become highly dispersed and has become very difficult to grow these scattered lands. As a result of this phenomenon, more and more land is being wasted, and the country has to import large quantities of agricultural products every year to meet the demand.
Why don't the collectives take back the abandoned and semi-abandoned land, remediate it, and then contract it to the peasant households for compensation?I raised this issue because I thought that doing so would benefit the country and the people, and at the same time, it would also bring peace to the big householdsFarmersMutual benefits. The state can contract out most of the remediated land for a feeFarmersFarmersThe contract fee is paid to the collective, which in turn allocates the contract feeLeft-behind elderly, as a pension. At the same time, a small portion of the land can also be allocatedLeft-behind elderlyto grow food, fruits and vegetables and become self-sufficient. In this way, not only can the country be increased andFarmerscan also make the efficient use of most of the land. Similar measures have been taken in some parts of the country, such as XinxiangHui County, Ordos Dalat Banner, Zhuhai Doumen District, etc., have achieved very good results. In these places,AgricultureHigh level of mechanization and specializationFarmers(Collective members) dividends and collective income are also higher, and rural governance andLeft-behind elderlyLiving conditions have also improved significantly.
However, I don't understand why our relevant departments, experts and scholars have chosen the complicated measure of separating the ownership, contracting and management rights of the contracted land. They have invested a lot of manpower, material resources, financial resources and time to implement this separation policy, butLand circulationwithAgricultureWhat about the results of development?My sense is that more and more land is being abandoned and semi-deserted, and for the sake of pushingLand circulationThe departments also had to resort to administrative means to build up large households. This led to some villagesLeft-behind elderly"Rob".CornwithChinese herbal medicinesphenomenon. I'm confused, there is such a simple and easy way to optimizeLand circulationWhy did you choose a complex solution?
In my opinion, method one is superior to method two. Method 1 is to give priority to the transfer of land back to village collectives or group collectives, then concentrate on consolidating the land and contract most of the land to rural households for compensation, and then distribute the contract feesLeft-behind elderly。At the same time, a small amount of land was also allocatedLeft-behind elderlyCarry out planting. This approach persists and consolidates the landCollective ownership, in line with the ideology of the first class, is taking the road of socialism. The second method seems to be a trial of land constructionCollective ownership, through 30 years, another 30 years, and a long-term unchanged way, and finally realize the privatization of land. My guess is that the choice of option 2 may be due to some political or economic considerations, but it may also be due to other factors, such as the influence of stakeholders. Whatever the reason, I'm confused and puzzled by this.
Through thinking about the issue of the transfer of farmer households' contracted land, I gradually found that there may be some hidden contradictions and complexities of interests. The land issue has always been a sensitive and complex issue, and in the process of resolving it, it is necessary to balance the interests of all parties and ensure social stability and stabilityFarmersinterests.
From my personal point of view, method one is a more feasible and reasonable option, which is able to keep the landCollective ownership, letFarmersand the collective. Collectives can increase their income through paid contracting, and at the same time, they can also allocate part of the landLeft-behind elderlyto allow them to remain self-sufficient. Such an approach is conducive to developmentAgriculture, increase agricultural products**, improveFarmersincome level, while also being able to maintainRuralsocial stability.
However, decision-making and policy-making is a rather complex process that requires a combination of different factors andRelationship of interest。We must realize that solving problems does not happen overnight and requires patience and wisdom. Therefore, we need further discussion and research to find out moreScienceand effectiveSolution。At the same time, we should also pay attentionRuralListen to the actual situationFarmersto involve them in the decision-making process. Only in this way can we find something that is fairer, more reasonable, and more feasibleSolutionto promote rural revitalization andFarmersof a happy life.
In short, the issue of the transfer of farmer households' contracted land involves many interests and complexities, and requires our in-depth thinking and research. It is hoped that relevant departments, experts and scholars can further improve and solve this problem for rural revitalization andFarmersContribute to a happy life. At the same time, it is also hoped that all parts of our country can make full use of land resources and realize itAgriculturesustainable development, forFood securitywithFarmersto make a positive contribution to the well-being.