Polish General Kraszewski recently made a startling public statement in which he confirmed that Poland would develop a nuclear bomb in the next few years. Admiral Kraszewski was convinced that the creation of such an arsenal was a long-term endeavor, and he hoped that this goal would be achieved. When asked about the cost of mastering and using nuclear weapons, he replied firmly: peace and security do not have to pay, but freedom does. He also noted that in the event that Europe cannot fully rely on the United States, 2 or 3 European countries with the ability to counter the strategic nuclear threat from Russia are the best option. Because of its firm stance and its inability to bow to the Russian threat, Poland is seen as the best candidate.
This Polish statement has been highly valued and hotly debated by all countries in the world. Poland is a country that does not have nuclear weapons, and it has chosen to have nuclear weapons because it has been building up its defense in recent years. Today, Poland's military spending is 3More than 2%, this rate is higher than that of the United States. Given its location in western Ukraine, Poland serves as a key bridgehead against Russian aggression, which is closely orchestrated by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The deployment to Poland of cutting-edge equipment such as the land-based "Aegis" missile defense system, F-35** fighter jets, and the airborne early warning system is strong evidence that Poland has strengthened its defense capability.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was established in 1949 to counter the growing power of the Soviet Union. But the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not fall apart as many expected. Rather, it continued to expand to include the countries of Eastern Europe and the former members of the Soviet Union. As the situation in Ukraine develops, so does the expansion of its power. Finland became a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in 2023, followed by Sweden, which was once neutral. While there are many initiatives aimed at strengthening its army, Poland is worried. In the 30 years since the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian war, we have been committed to disarming and reducing our defenses, which is an undeniable reality. In the aftermath of the Russia-Ukraine war, this effect has been fully felt, which has made Poland further realize the importance of nuclear armament.
In terms of nuclear armaments, Russia is definitely a strong contender, with as many nuclear warheads as the United States, both of which are more than 5,000. This amount of nuclear ** makes Russia the most deterrent ** in the world. In comparison, France and the United Kingdom, the two European nuclear powers, have only more than 300, while the number of nuclear weapons in these two countries is only more than 200. It should be noted that although there are many members of the nuclear ** club in Europe, none of them have the strength of the "three nuclears". This means that when Russia faces a nuclear threat, it will be difficult for Europe to respond without the support of the United States as a "nuclear umbrella".
In this geographical environment, the Polish general Kraszewski expressed a shocking opinion in an interview. He believes that in order for Europe to strengthen its security forces, it must study having its own nuclear facilities. Look at Poland, which bought F-35 fighters from the United States, which is considered a good place to carry nuclear **. This advanced fighter is capable of carrying two B61-12 nuclear bombs in the magazine, which has a nuclear warhead of 300, 5000, 10000, 50,000 kilowatts. This superior effectiveness makes the B61-12 a powerful deterrent in future "limited nuclear warfare", transmission and even "targeted killing". Poland attaches great importance to this "clean smart" bomb, since such a bomb can receive unbalanced benefits in traditional battles.
In addition, Poland noted with interest that although the Aegis Ashore missile is mainly defensive, it is quite possible that it will be equipped with an MK-41 vertical-launch missile. The system can be converted into an offensive attack**, which can be loaded with a "Tomahawk" that can be loaded with nuclear missiles. With Russia's growing nuclear deterrent, NATO countries are no longer limited to building missile defense systems, but are developing strategically important offensive ** to deal with possible nuclear threats.
Therefore, European countries must review their nuclear weapons strategies and armaments to ensure that they have sufficient strength to respond to the nuclear threat from Russia. However, in order to ensure nuclear and regional stability, it is necessary to strengthen international cooperation and control.
February** power stimulation program