The superpower of the United States is now a bit confusing. The most troubling thing is that they are becoming more and more unreliable in their speech. One moment to say the east, the other to say the west, double standard and no standard characteristics more and more prominent. Let's look at a few examples:
First, at last year's meeting between the leaders of China and the United States, they agreed to strengthen people, cultural and technological exchanges. However, as soon as they turned around, the United States arbitrarily interrogated and stranded Chinese students, and even cancelled their passports at the airport, resulting in many international students being unable to study normally, bringing great passivity and losses to them and their families.
Second, at the meetings in Bali and San Francisco, the United States and leaders repeatedly pledged to uphold the one-China principle, support the reunification of the Chinese nation, and affirm that Taiwan is a part of China. But the backhand shook hands with the ** elements, and even sent ** to support the ** elements during the Taiwan ** period.
Looking at the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, on the one hand, it calls for the avoidance of more humanitarian**, but on the other hand, it provides Israel with a large amount** and has been supporting Israel's military operations, resulting in the deaths of nearly 30,000 Palestinian civilians.
In addition, on the one hand, they emphasize the market economy and fairness, but on the other hand, they search Chinese enterprises in the United States for no reason, which has a huge impact on the operation of enterprises.
Moreover, on the one hand, it is said that science and technology have no borders, but on the other hand, it exaggerates the world, engages in technological hegemony, and prevents the normal exchange and joint development of science and technology.
These actions are not quite in keeping with the status of a superpower. There is an old Chinese saying, "If you don't have faith, you don't know what you can do." How can a big country with global influence exert its due influence once it loses its promise? Therefore, when dealing with the Americans, you really have to think differently.
To sum up, this style of the United States is indeed elusive. In the course of the interaction, it was suggested that we should be more flexible in our responses, and at the same time, in international relations, we should also adhere to principles and maintain the quality of keeping our promises. With regard to complex international affairs, we should abandon stereotypes and understand and respond with a more open mind. What do you think?