Recently, Guangzhou has fired the first shot of the room ticket system to support the transformation of urban villages! As one of the three traditional first-tier cities, Guangzhou took the lead in launching the requisition, demolition and resettlement of house tickets this time, which made many netizens dream of returning to the "era of shed reform", and Guangzhou also rushed to the hot search in one fell swoop. 
Does the "room ticket" still have a miraculous effect on stimulating the market?
Beijing is also a first-tier city, will the "room ticket" policy follow? If you follow up, which houses can catch up with this wave of policies? no.1What the hell is a room ticket? What is a room ticket? It refers to the settlement voucher issued by the expropriator to the expropriated person for the purchase of the house after the monetary quantification of the expropriated person's housing resettlement compensation rights. To put it bluntly, this is equivalent to a bill, and its function is similar to that of food stamps and cloth stamps from the 50s to the 80s of the 20th century. The difference is that the food stamp is a kind of grain purchase voucher issued in the era of material shortage, while the house ticket is a house purchase voucher to compensate the demolition and relocation households. 
In April 2023, the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China held a meeting and pointed out that the transformation of urban villages in super megacities will be actively and steadily promoted. This is an important measure to improve people's livelihood, expand domestic demand, and promote high-quality urban development. Three months later, the General Office issued the "Guiding Opinions on Actively and Steadily Promoting the Transformation of Urban Villages in Super Large Cities", proposing to give full play to the decisive role of the market in the allocation of resources, better play the leading role, increase policy support for the transformation of urban villages, actively innovate the transformation model, and encourage and support the participation of private capital. The transformation of urban villages has always been the most troublesome problem for megacities. 
According to statistics, the top four cities with the most urban villages in China are Beijing, Shenzhen, Shanghai and Guangzhou. There are 287 urban villages in Beijing, 241 in Shenzhen, 225 in Shanghai and more than 300 in Guangzhou. The cracks of high-rise buildings are interspersed with dense "old and dilapidated small", most of which are still in the core area, in this case, in situ resettlement, blindly increasing the floor area ratio, and the problem of big cities is becoming more and more serious, so Guangzhou took the lead in trying the "room ticket resettlement system". Li Yujia, chief researcher of the Guangdong Provincial Housing Policy Research Center, believes that the resettlement of housing tickets is in line with the interests of the three parties, reducing the demand for resettlement of relocated land, realizing intensive and saving of land, shortening the transformation cycle of urban villages, and improving the efficiency of urban village transformation. In addition, it can save the cost of resettlement and relocation, and reduce the pressure on financial funds; In terms of developers, housing tickets will release a huge demand for housing purchases, which will have a certain driving effect on the destocking of new houses; On the villagers' side, in addition to the house and cash compensation, another option has been added. In the past, the resettlement houses were allocated by lottery, and the villagers had almost no way to choose the houses according to their own wishes. Now, house ticket resettlement can give villagers more autonomy to live in their homes. However, it remains to be seen whether the house ticket has a pulling effect on the entire market, after all, the room ticket amount is limited, and it needs to be replaced within the designated new housing range, and the demolition and renovation families are likely to choose other compensation methods. Regarding the details of Guangzhou's room ticket system, everyone replied to [Guangzhou] in the background to view.
no.2Will Beijing, as a first-tier city, follow suit? Recently, Wuhan, Hefei and other cities have issued the "Pilot Implementation Plan for the Redevelopment of Inefficient Land". Among them, Hefei also made it clear that it will explore and improve the monetized compensation standards for the original land rights holders, expand the ways of compensation in kind, and implement itMonetization, house tickets, non-local, purchase of commercial housing, and shareholding at a priceand other diversified compensation and resettlement methods. It is conceivable that the room ticket system will most likely be widely used in the future. At the same time, some real estate experts pointed outGuangzhou, as a first-tier city, mentioned the resettlement of housing tickets for the first time, which represents the policy direction to a certain extent. In the case of the reversal of the relationship between real estate supply and demand, coupled with the relatively tight local finances, the future demand for demolition and resettlement, the policy will encourage more housing ticket resettlement. Li Yujia, chief researcher of the Guangdong Provincial Housing Policy Research Center, speculated that the other three first-tier cities will most likely launch housing ticket resettlement policies in the future. At the same time, he also proposed that "the Urban Village Reconstruction Association will provide a variety of resettlement forms for relocated households to choose from, and use preferential policies to encourage housing ticket resettlement, but it is not necessary to use housing ticket resettlement in its entirety." "After all, the inventory of commercial housing is concentrated in the periphery of the city, and there are not many new housing projects to choose from in the central area and the surrounding areas of the central area, and in today's market, the housing prices in the peripheral areas are obvious**. In such a situation, encouraging villagers in urban villages to "go out with their house tickets" can be imagined. 
no.3What kind of houses can catch up with this wave of renovations? In September last year, the Ministry of Natural Resources issued the Notice of the Ministry of Natural Resources on Carrying out Pilot Work on the Redevelopment of Inefficient LandBeijing is included in the list, but it is not the whole area, only Fangshan and the Economic Development Zone. 
The document makes it clear that the redevelopment of inefficient land cannot be used for commercial housing, but it is necessary to "explore the conditions and procedures for the linkage transformation of industrial to commercial" and "industrial to residential". ”
Although there is no clearer explanation, looking at these two familiar expressions, it reminds me of the attempt to build a communist house on collective construction land in Daxing District.
Nowadays, Daxing Yinghai is already the "big household" of the city's co-ownership housing, and at the same time, the area also has industrial and municipal planning, and the market acceptance is also high. I wonder if Beijing will explore more in this area in the future. It is worth noting that the transformation of urban villages is not only the self-built houses of villagers, but also includes old residential areas, and the renovation of old factories belongs to this category. Guangzhou Liwan is not a traditional urban village, but an old and dilapidated house, "a staircase room with five or six floors, a separate toilet and kitchen, a small area, and a dilapidated old husband's house and dormitory." "There are also such houses in Beijing, but unlike Beijing, even in the center of Guangzhou, the total price of these houses in Guangzhou is only one million, and no one has taken over yet.
Share these today, the old rules, everyone has news, or have something you want to see, see you in the comment area!