With the success of Trump's party election and his re-approach to the White House, he re-released his bold words, saying that as long as he becomes the United States, he will end the Russian-Ukrainian conflict within 24 hours and let Putin and Zelensky sit down for negotiations.
In response to his declaration, Russian Minister Sergei Lavrov publicly said that Trump's so-called "rapid end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict" is simply unrealistic. Because Ukraine does not seem ready to accept any kind of solution. Russia cannot believe in anything that has not yet been realized.
In fact, as early as February last year, Trump had already said the same thing, when he said that as long as he was re-elected, he would immediately give Putin and Zelensky a ** to facilitate the trilateral talks to reach an armistice agreement within 24 hours to end the conflict. It's just that it was Zelensky who objected at the time. Zelenskyy said that if Trump is willing to come to Ukraine, he will spend 24 minutes telling Trump why the Russia-Ukraine war cannot end and telling him to abandon this naïve idea.
Someone may agree with Zelensky's idea. After all, the war has come to this point, and Ukraine and Russia have long become a blood feud. Unless one side falls completely, it is impossible to stop.
Now the tolerance of the American people for the behavior of Americans to pay Ukraine has long been reached to the limit. At the moment, only the elites of the United States and the Democratic Party representing them are still supporting Ukraine without interruption. Trump is now saying a 24-hour halt to the war, arguably a campaign promise. But what if 24 hours have passed?
Trump now says that he wants to solve the problem in 24 hours that cannot be solved in two or three years, but if he fails to speak in the end and flashes his waist, will his approval rating decline in the end?
But Ben Hu has other opinions, you say Trump is naïve, but I think he is not naïve at all, and it is impossible for naïve people to run for the United States. The end of the Russia-Ukraine conflict he said, as far as Ben Hu's personal understanding is concerned, is not so much to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but to end the US intervention in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Do you think the Americans care about the war between Russia and Ukraine? Concerned about the lives and deaths of civilians in Ukraine? No, they don't care, they only care if the United States continues to pay for Ukraine.
So if I were Trump, just stop the aid to Ukraine, and then for the American people, it would be about the same as solving the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, because they can't see this conflict, and this conflict will not affect American civilians.
Is this an act of covering one's ears and stealing the bell? Yes, but it really works if you can't stand it, for example, during the new crown epidemic before, guess how the United States ** solved the epidemic? Eliminate the virus? No, they can't get rid of it. So the United States directly declared that there was no epidemic, just a big flu. See? The United States is no longer in the safe supply of the epidemic. Although the epidemic has not been resolved, but the epidemic prevention policy that the American people do not like is over, then the epidemic is over for them.
So for Trump, the means to resolve the Russian-Ukrainian conflict within 24 hours is very simple, as long as the conflict is declared over first, and then aid to Ukraine is stopped, then for the American people, the Russian-Ukrainian problem has been perfectly resolved.
This is American politics now, and the politicians elected by the Americans, which is absurd, isn't it? But that's the reality of America.