Xiang Ligang is angry and discriminates against academic qualifications, and there are no more than 5 people in China who are higher than me!
Xiang Ligang, a well-known expert in the field of communications, lost control of his emotions while cooking, and he harshly criticized those who discriminated against his secondary school education, calling them inferior. He stressed that any issue that touched on his secondary school liberal arts background did not match him, so these people could not be compared with him.
Mr Xiang further stated that he deliberately exposed his secondary school background in order to give the opponent an illusion and then dealt with the opponent in a surprise way.
He explained that although he had studied at a technical secondary school, if he did not mention it, the world might not know about it. He pointed out that the admission rate of secondary schools in that year was comparable to the admission rate of today's 985 colleges and universities, which was part of elite education at that time.
After several years of work accumulation, Mr. Xiang was successfully admitted to the graduate school of 985 University and changed his major. He cited as an example that the governor of the People's Bank of China had a similar experience, first from a secondary school and later admitted to the Chinese People's University for graduate studies.
Xiang Ligang angrily appealed: You don't even understand such basic common sense, thinking that simply mentioning a secondary school degree can belittle me?
Xiang Ligang particularly emphasized that after years of industrial observation and research, he believes that there are no more than five people in China who surpass him, which is the result of his unique formula.
He pointed out that his judgment was very accurate in the general trend, and he has already published a book that will soon be available in traditional Chinese and translated into English by the world's leading publishing houses. He also said that another book is coming soon and has already been translated into Arabic. He believes that his theoretical system is the original theory of the development of human civilization from agriculture to industry and then to intelligence.
He stressed that these are not his boasts, but objectively existing facts. If anyone was really interested, they would have hailed him as a world-class observer.
Xiang Ligang questioned whether there are any economists in China who can make such industrial judgments as his. He argues that a lot of people who claim to have a Ph.D. are really just spreading anxiety, they don't understand the substance at all.
He angrily rebuked those who tried to belittle him by attacking his academic qualifications, arguing that it was simply not enough to compare with him. He pointed out that those who continue to talk about academic qualifications at the age of 40 are losers, they are just making senseless personal attacks, and such people are inferior.
Mr. Xiang was always so forthright that whenever he was busy making breakfast, he would suddenly go berserk, either attacking economists and professors, or scolding people in the field of science and technology, calling them fraud, incompetent, and greedy for money. He accused that the ** published in Nature is not difficult, and it can be easily achieved as long as there is money. He believes that these ** published in Nature are just a means taken by domestic professors to evaluate professional titles. Lao Xiang's outspokenness caused heated discussions among netizens, and some people suggested that he spend money to publish a few ** articles in "Nature" to show his insight. In addition, if he can publish a few top articles, he can immediately become a world-renowned communications expert, without the need to work a team or boast.
Mr. Xiang is best known for his view that China's technological prowess has surpassed that of the United States. He pointed out that China is leading in three areas, which proves that China's scientific and technological strength is surpassing. He pointed out that it is not necessary to pay too much attention to superficial phenomena such as the number of ** and university rankings, but to pay more attention to basic capabilities, such as materials, energy and information. In these respects, China is so far ahead of the United States that it is no longer a competitor to China.
When talking about the general direction, Mr. Xiang also mentioned some typical examples, such as electromagnetic guns, supersonic missiles, etc., and he believes that the United States is also lagging behind China in these areas. In addition, he pointed to the next big opportunity - smart cars, saying that China is already ahead of the United States across the board.
He criticized that the United States lacks substantial value other than hyping up concepts. For those who believe that the United States is still technologically strong, he thinks they are stuck in the assumptions of more than a decade ago.
Some netizens expressed doubts about whether Xiang Ligang, a well-known communications expert, is an expert or a layman in the field of science and technology. An article claiming that Chinese technology has surpassed that of the United States raises such questions. Some netizens also pointed out that what Lao Xiang is pursuing is traffic, and his remarks are just to create topics.
Academician He Zuoxiu's comment on Mr. Xiang Ligang was: Mr. Xiang Ligang is a complete layman. He believes that Xiang Ligang's observation of science and technology is just standing outside the door and watching from afar, but Xiang Ligang thinks that he is already an industry insider.
Regarding the topic of liberal arts secondary school students, although Lao Xiang repeatedly explained that he didn't care, in fact, his mind was still obvious, after all, the identity of a liberal arts secondary school was a hard injury for him.
Lao Xiang said that he was a secondary school student in the 80s, and the status of secondary school at that time was higher than that of today's 985 universities. However, some netizens pointed out that Mr. Xiang was not admitted to the technical secondary school in junior high school, but was admitted to the technical secondary school in high school, because he failed the mathematics in the college entrance examination.
Some people questioned how they could engage in high-tech if they failed the college entrance examination mathematics? Especially when talking about 5G, communications, and artificial intelligence, can you understand these principles and logic? Academician He's comment was considered to hit the nail on the head, pointing out the current situation that Xiang Ligang was just standing outside the high-tech door and observing, but he thought he was an expert.
However, in any case, it is still very inspiring for a secondary school student with a liberal arts accounting background to become the most authoritative 5G communication expert in China through self-education.
As for Lao Xiang's claim that there are no more than five people with a higher level of Chinese than him, who are these five people?
Netizens proposed several candidates who may be of a higher level than Xiang Ligang, including Professor Zhang Weiwei, Professor Jin Canrong, Professor Chen Ping, Teacher Da Sima, and Lao Hu and others. There is some controversy as to whether there are others.
In the end, being controversial is not a bad thing. It's even better to have a strong sense of self-confidence. It is hoped that under the impetus of this strong self-confidence, we will be able to speed up the pace of basic research, rapidly overcome the difficulties of high technology, no longer be constrained by Western countries such as Europe and the United States, completely shake off the blockade of science and technology, and truly achieve the goal of stepping into the ranks of the world's leading scientific and technological powers.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.