"The inside story of the interview is revealed", Peking University graduates have not been ashore for 3 years in the public examination, and they complained about the resonance
Civil service positions have always attracted much attention, because of their stability, generous benefits and high social status, they have attracted the attention of many job seekers, and the civil service has become the first choice for employment.
Normally, students who graduated from prestigious universities such as Tsinghua University and Peking University are considered to pursue a higher-level career, while civil servants, although their salaries are relatively low, are more stable, so they are not theoretically in line with the choice of elite students.
However, the reality was unexpected. In the team of the public examination, there is no shortage of graduates from prestigious schools, and even many highly educated and returnee students, which makes the examination more difficult. A graduate of Peking University, after failing to go ashore for three consecutive years, expressed his doubts, which caused widespread resonance.
The candidate, who graduated from Peking University, has been preparing for the civil service exam since he graduated, however, he failed the interview for three consecutive years, despite passing the written exam every time. Looking at the candidates who succeeded in the interview, he was confused, feeling that there might be an unknown insider, and suspected that someone was manipulating behind the scenes, which led to his elimination.
A similar situation is also present in other candidates. A netizen mentioned that his relative graduated from a 985 college and entered the interview process with excellent written test results, but was eventually eliminated in the interview. Therefore, many people began to wonder if there was a "cat greasy" in the public *** and whether there was interference from human factors. But in reality, in order to ensure the fairness of the exam, the interviewer is usually transferred out, and the entire interview process is monitored. In addition, cheating is absolutely not tolerated, which can ruin the examiner's career, so most examiners will not take this risk. Even if there are human factors, it can only prove that the other party has the corresponding strength, and the candidate should accept the fact of losing.
The experience of Peking University graduates has resonated with many candidates, but the reasons behind the failure are worth going deeper. Being able to be admitted to a prestigious school shows that the student's academic foundation is very good, but it is understandable that he always fails in the interview process. However, what happened to this Peking University graduate is actually a microcosm of what many candidates have experienced.
Many students who graduated from 985 colleges mistakenly think that they can easily pass the public *** with their own ability, although the written test results are good. However, as soon as it came to the interview session, there were problems and they were eventually eliminated. In the final analysis, this reflects the inadequacy of students' comprehensive abilities.
Public selection is a comprehensive selection, involving written examinations, interviews, political examinations, physical examinations and other links. This means that candidates need to have strong comprehensive ability, and strong test scores alone are not enough to succeed, especially in the interview session, which tests students' ability to perform on the spot and deal with problems. As a result, those who will only take the test are likely to be eliminated.
There are also some students from ordinary families around me who have successfully applied for civil service positions, but without exception, they are all very comprehensive. While relationships may play a role in helping to a certain extent, it can be difficult to take shortcuts if you don't have enough skills. As a result, many candidates are unable to successfully land for a long time, and the root cause is their lack of personal ability and failure to find the right direction of study after repeated failures.
Public *** is a challenge of layers of assessment, and if you want to go ashore smoothly, candidates need to prepare in an all-round way. Before applying for the exam, you should review the background of yourself and your family to ensure that you meet the recruitment requirements and avoid problems in the political review process. In the preparation stage, students should study hard, have a solid grasp of the basic knowledge, and strengthen and consolidate them through practice questions. As for the interview process, you need to have a good psychological quality and on-the-spot performance ability, learn interview skills in advance, and practice and simulate drills to exercise language expression and social skills.
After successfully passing all the levels and entering the publicity stage, candidates should not take it lightly. During this period, it is necessary to maintain self-discipline and urge family members to stay calm to prevent over-excitement and making mistakes that affect the final hiring result.
In general, there are many reasons for the failure of the public *** interview, although there may be some human factors, but the fundamental problem lies in personal ability. If multiple attempts are still unsuccessful, candidates should summarize the lessons learned, adjust their learning strategies in time, and do not insist on going their own way, and may be able to find a breakthrough by changing their thinking and direction.
Topic: Do you think there is an inside story in the public examination interview? Welcome to leave a message to share and discuss.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.