Analysis of the impact of rice straw returning on sustainable agricultural development
However, due to the passage of time, the academic community has less and less respect for "authority", "authority" and "authority", and the opinions and practices of once-highly regarded "authoritative" scholars on certain issues are generally regarded as "untrue", "untrustworthy", and even "anti". In China, especially on the issue of returning rice straw to the field, some scholars and scholars have put forward different views. Some of the negative effects on the sustainable development of our country have also been elaborated from some special terms and materials. However, these highly specialized and difficult points of view are difficult for the average person to understand. Scholars have been debating soil acidification and fertilizer use, but this debate is far from the actual workings of agricultural production. For farmers, the experience and practical operation of agricultural production can give them more visual guidance. Therefore, the discussion on the issue of rice straw returning to the land is not convincing.
On the return of rice straw to the field.
In view of the problem of rice straw returning, some scholars believe that the reasons for rice straw returning to the field, such as land acidification and improper use of chemical fertilizers, etc. They point out that returning straw to the field can speed up the acidity of the land, making it more acidic than using nitrogen. This kind of truth seems to be very reasonable, but in the eyes of people who are really engaged in agricultural production, it is not as real as the personal experience in agricultural production. Many scholars have made a deep analysis of this theoretically, such as: "acidic", "acidic", "acidic", "acidic", etc. For most farmers, they prefer to decide how to return rice straw to the field based on their own planting experience, so it is difficult to generalize the opinions of experts in practice.
In the technical terms of "experts", there are often many things that ordinary farmers do not understand, such as soil acidification, metabolic reversal, etc., resulting in a gap in understanding between experts and farmers. Experienced farmers have accumulated a lot of agricultural experience in the production process, and this experience is often more reliable and intuitive. So, when they try to explain a complex farming problem in technical language, do they think about the real needs of most farmers and how well they understand them? It is also worth considering whether the academic work of relevant scholars can be combined with practical work.
From practical experience to theoretical learning.
In the long-term production and operation activities, the large amount of labor experience obtained by peasant households is a valuable property obtained by them in production and business activities. In the farmer's view, planting is not only a kind of work, but also a kind of learning, and it is necessary to accumulate experience, observe and practice, and only then can there be harvest. At present, most of the research on farmers' behavior by domestic scholars focuses on the theory and mode of farmers' production process, which is quite detached from farmers' production practice.
Since scholars in various fields have different views and levels of agricultural products than farmers, there are also different views on certain issues. Scholars have made some theoretical arguments on the issue of returning rice straw to the field, but it is consistent with the reality of agricultural production and needs in-depth discussion and practice. Specialist skills are important, but it is worth pondering whether they can be applied to real production.
Dialogue between experts and farmers.
It is necessary to "respect each other and explore together". Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the practical ties with the peasant households, listen more to the opinions of the peasant households, and understand the doubts of the peasant households, so as to provide more guidance in practice. At the same time, peasant households should actively carry out technical training, absorb advanced cultivation ideas and techniques, and improve their own cultivation techniques.
Farming is a complex and practical discipline that requires practical experience and specialized skills to complement each other and learn from each other. As long as there is a sincere cooperation between engineers and farmers, they will be able to contribute their wisdom and strength to the sustainable development of agriculture. Therefore, in the relationship between technicians and peasant households, we should not only unilaterally guide and be guided, but should be based on equality and reciprocity, so as to achieve all-round development of agriculture.