In our evaluation of historical figures, we are often swayed by ** "Romance of the Three Kingdoms". Liu Bei was given the name of benevolence and righteousness, while Cao Cao was labeled a traitor. However, this assessment is not entirely accurate, because ** is a interpretation of history, not an objective historical record.
As an important force in the troubled times of the late Eastern Han Dynasty, Cao Cao's ability and talent are undeniable. From an obscure little man, he eventually rose to prominence, defeated many opponents, and established his own hegemony. His military prowess and strategic deployment, as well as his handling of internal affairs, show his extraordinary ability. Therefore, simply classifying him as a "traitorous male" is not an all-round evaluation.
Although Liu Bei was given the name of benevolence and righteousness, he also had his own shortcomings in the actual historical process. In terms of military capabilities and combat strategies, it is still slightly inferior to Cao Cao. Although he showed a certain benevolence in politics, his military ability and leadership skills were not entirely satisfactory.
As the founder of Eastern Wu, although Sun Quan did not have a direct contest between Cao Cao and Liu Bei, his ability and political skills should not be underestimated. He was able to gain a foothold in troubled times, and finally sat on the throne of the emperor, showing his political wisdom and leadership skills.
Therefore, we should treat these historical figures hospitably and not be swayed by the fictional plots in them. Each character has their strengths and weaknesses, and all show a different side in a specific historical context.