Analysis of the pros and cons of one person and one field! Farmer well-being**, what is your attitude?
Introduction. At present, the contradiction between farmland transfer and land transfer is becoming increasingly prominent. To this end, the state has introduced a complete set of measures for the management of rural homesteads, and "one household, one field" is one of the main contents of the rural homestead reform. The purpose of this system is to achieve the goal of "every household has a field" by "substituting land for fields", "replacing fields with fields", and "taking fields as the foundation". "One household, one mu" is an important measure for the reform of rural land circulation in China. After expounding the basic principle of "one mu per household" and its impact on the interests of farmers, this paper evaluates the effect of the implementation of "one mu per household" according to its own understanding and views.
The principle of exclusive land ownership by one family.
1. The principle of voluntariness, consultation and democracy.
The principles of "one family, one house" are "voluntary", "consultative" and "democratic", and there are no mandatory and mandatory requirements. On this basis, we should fully respect the will of peasant households, give them the right to choose freely, enable them to freely circulate and integrate, and ensure that their decision-making is carried out through democratic consultation.
At the same time, "one mu per household" is also a kind of protection for the right of peasant households to contract and manage land. The state is not allowed to make appropriate adjustments and requisitions on the grounds of land circulation, thus protecting the legitimate rights and interests of peasants.
2. Based on land property rights.
The one-mu system is based on the area of the farmer's homestead confirmed to the household, and in the process of replacement and merger, no additional base is set. This principle guarantees that the system is fair and reasonable, and that it cannot be used as a pretext for transferring land to or in the name of another person.
The benefits of a piece of land for one family.
1. More efficient land use.
The "one household, one mu" system unifies the scattered and scattered small plots of land into one large collective, thereby improving the land use efficiency of the village collective. Through integration, the scale of farmer cooperatives can be expanded and mechanized, thereby improving the efficiency of agriculture.
In addition, the integrated plot can also be filled with ditches, clear obstacles, and expand vegetation. The surplus cultivated land in rural areas can be transferred to increase the income of village-level collective economy.
2. Promote the development of modern agriculture.
The integrated plot is a highly concentrated and highly concentrated area, which is very suitable for the use of mechanical farming and the introduction of modern agricultural technology.
It can not only improve food production, but also promote the advancement of agricultural technology and equipment. Through the expansion of production scale and the application of modern science and technology, peasant households have increased their income.
3. Mitigate the impact of natural disasters.
The reclaimed cultivated land can better reduce the constraints of soil erosion on cultivated land. Consolidating farmland and adding auxiliary equipment such as water supply, electricity, and roads can enhance the sustainability of agriculture and reduce the impact of natural disasters on food production. This is of great significance for improving food production and increasing farmers' incomes.
Personal Summary. In short, "one mu per household" is a method that can better resolve the contradiction between the dispersion and dispersion of peasant households' land. On the basis of the principles of voluntariness, consultation and democracy, and on the basis of ensuring the interests of peasant households, it promotes the rational use of rural land and the development of the rural economy. At the same time, it can also improve the quality of agriculture and increase farmers' income by introducing advanced agricultural technology and equipment. The implementation of "one household, one house" still faces the problems of low participation of rural households and difficulty in the process of circulation, but it is undoubtedly a major change. As a first-class editor with profound knowledge, I am very much in favor of the implementation of the "one household, one field" policy, and believe that this will lay a good foundation for promoting China's agricultural modernization.
References. 1.After the village is demolished, how will the farmland be planned? -- Explain the provisions of "one household, one field". Source: China's Rural Economy 2020.
2.Empirical analysis and empirical research on the balanced distribution of production factors under the model of "one household and one field". Source: Agricultural Science and Technology and Economics, 2019.
3.Under the model of "one household, one field", the sustainable development of China's rural areas has been preliminarily carried out. Source: 2020 Rural Economic Issues Study.