In the logical judgment question type of the vocational aptitude test, the possibility reasoning argument has always been the focus of the test, and the weakened and strengthened questions are the places where everyone is easy to lose points. Therefore, learning to weaken and strengthen well is one of our exam preparationsThe main objective
Through the past test questions, we can see that the text expression of the weakened and strengthened question stems and options is relatively long, and how to quickly grasp the weakened and strengthened solution points in a limited time is the key point we need to learn and master. Today, Tutu will take you to quickly find the solution point of "seeking difference" from the "difference-seeking" thinking of possibility argumentation.
OneWhat is the "difference-seeking" thinking of the possibility argument?
The "difference-seeking" thinking of possibility argument, also known as the difference-seeking argument, is commonly understood as the process of drawing conclusions by comparing the two to "find differences".
For example, Student A and Student B are good friends, they study together every day, and the types and numbers of questions they do are similar every day. However, student B has the habit of summarizing every day, while student A does not. And in the final exam, student B got a better score than A. So I came to the conclusion that summarizing every day can help students achieve good grades. This is a simple argument for seeking differences, and through the different conditions of students A and B summarizing their habits every day, we can get the conclusion that summarizing every day can help students achieve good grades.
Second, how to be rightHow can the argument for disagreement be weakened and strengthened?
Based on the above examples, we can think about it:
Student A and Student B study together every day, and the type and number of questions they do every day are similar, but Student A does not have the habit of summarizing every day as much as Student B, can we conclude that summarizing every day is the reason for Student B's good grades? Actually, not necessarily. If we can find other different attributes between student A and student B that affect the grade, we can have a weakening effect on the conclusion. For example, every night, the father of student B's university professor will take him to do thinking training, then the reason for this to affect student B's better grades is not necessarily the habit of summarizing every day, but it may be that his father takes him to do thinking training, which weakens the conclusion of the question stem. Similarly, if we can find more similarities between student A and student B in learning, the possibility of other factors being affected will be ruled out, and the possibility of good grades caused by the habit of summarizing every day in the question stem will increase, which will play a stronger role in the conclusion of the question stem.
Let's sort it out as a whole:
The way in which the argument for difference is weakenedLook for other different factors that affect the outcome between the two.
Ways to strengthen the argument for differencesFind more of the same factors that affect the outcome between the two.