In this CBA game,Beijing Enterprises Co., LtdThe away team narrowly won 114-112Zhejiang Guangsha, but a controversial penalty decision at the end of the game became the focus of attention. With 2 minutes left in the gameBeijing Enterprises Co., Ltdteam membersZhang FanwithZhejiang GuangshaTeam member Duan Liqian collided with his feet in a confrontationZhang FanThereforeBroken feetInjured and lost possession. After the referee reviewed the video, he did not make up for Duan Liqian's foul, which triggered the voice of criticism of the referee's selective blindness. ** Zhou He expressed his dissatisfaction with the penalty in the commentary.
In the case that the referee still insists on not changing the penalty after reviewing the videoBeijing Enterprises Co., LtdContinue to work on attacking opportunities with the advantage of rebounding in the front court. In the final 37 seconds, Felder made a crucial shotThree-point shot, forBeijing Enterprises Co., LtdThe win was sealed. Zhou He posted that in the face of a referee's mistake, the best response is to throw the ball into the basket. The controversy over the decision in this match not only called into question the referee's work again, but also raised concerns about the issue of selective blindness.
Looking back on the game, Zhou He also mentioned the first quarter of the gameMin LuleiDissatisfaction with the referee's decision. The technical foul was also caused by the dissatisfaction caused by the referee's omission. Luckily, the result of the match did not have much of an impact due to the referee's erroneous decision. However, this controversial decision has once again sparked a discussion about the accuracy of the referee's blowing.
The controversial decision mentioned in the article occurred at a critical moment in the final moments of the game, due toZhang FanBroken feetInjuries,Zhejiang GuangshaHe took the opportunity to counter-attack and threw a shotThree-point shotto narrow the difference to 3 points. This crucial decision sparked controversy and criticism, mainly due to the referee's selective ignorance of Duan LiqianZhang Fanfoul action.
According to CBA rules, if the contact is a physical foul, the referee can make up the foul and cancel itZhao YanhaoThrownThree-point shot。However, after reviewing the footage, the referee insisted that Duan's actions did not constitute a physical foul, and that the ordinary foul rule could not be compensated for by video replay. This decision is in line with the CBA's regulations on the use of video referees, but it ignores Duan Liqian's rightZhang Fanfoul action.
The penalty for selective blindness sparked strong criticism from **. Commentator Zhou He bluntly said during the game that Duan Liqian obviously made a flying shovel action, but he didn't blow a foul, does it meanZhejiang GuangshaMust win the game? This statement highlights the doubts about the impartiality of the referee. Regarding the final result of the game, ** person Zhou He also expressed his opinion, he believes that in the case of selective blindness of the referee, the best response is to throw the ball into the basket.
Looking back at the whole game, the referee's blowing became a controversial topic. Whether it was the selective blindness of the referee at the end of the game, or the first quarter of the gameMin LuleiThe dissatisfaction with the referee's penalty raises questions about the accuracy of the referee's blowing.
In this controversial decision, the referee still insisted that his initial judgment did not make up the foul after watching the video, and this decision sparked criticism from the first people. Although according to the rules of use of the CBA, the referee's decision was in accordance with the regulations, in fact, Duan Liqian's actions clearly constituted a pairZhang Fanfouls. The mistake of the referee blowing the penalty this time makes people question the fairness of the whole game.
However, the decision did not have much of an impact on the outcome of the gameBeijing Enterprises Co., LtdHe maintained a solid lead through the advantage of rebounding in the front court, and finally managed to seal the victory. Compared to the referee's mistakes, the team's own efforts and performances are more crucial. Zhou He, as the commentator of the Beijing Enterprises side, also emphasized this point.
On the whole, the satisfaction of the referee blowing the penalty is relatively low. The decision has once again sparked a discussion about the referee's ability to enforce the law and the impartiality. For fans and **, the fairness of every game is crucial, and only by ensuring that referees perform their duties fairly and accurately in the game can the fairness of the game and the fairness of the competition be maintained.
The referee's selective blindness is inSportsIt's not the first time I've played and I'm not particularly happy with the situation. In a game, the referee's judgment should be fair and accurate, and should not affect the normal conduct of the game due to personal reasons or other factors.
And in this CBA game, the referee's selective blindness decision sparked controversy and criticism. Whether it is the announcement of the commentator Zhou He or the criticism of the referee's behavior, it reflects the questioning of the fairness of the referee. As referees, they should always maintain an impartial point of view, adhere to the principles of professional refereeing, and accurately judge all situations in the game.
As a fan and a fan, what I want to see is a fair and accurate referee blow. The referee's decision not only has a direct impact on the outcome of the game, but also affects the mood of the players and the overall atmosphere of the game. Therefore, we should pay attention to and criticize the referee's selective blindness and other mistakes, so as to prompt the referee to improve his own law enforcement level and ensure the fairness and competitiveness of the game.
In general, the referee blew the penalty isSportsAn important part of the game determines the fairness and normal progress of the game. Referees should always maintain the principle of impartiality and accurately judge all situations in the game. At the same time, fans and referees should also actively participate in the discussion and criticism of referees, promote referees to improve their own law enforcement level, and contribute to the fairness and competitiveness of the game.