February** Dynamic Incentive Program
Is our China already a threat to NATO security?According to the transcript of the speech released by NATO, when talking about whether NATO, as a regional alliance, should expand its influence, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg changed his tricks to justify, on the one hand, saying that NATO is indeed a transatlantic alliance, including Europe and North America, and will continue to maintain regional alliance relations. On the other hand, he said that the transatlantic region faces a threat not only from the great powers of the East, but also from a global threat, and that security is no longer regional, but global.
This NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg, his remarks have indeed refreshed our cognition! How else can you say that? Such a complementarity between left and right, such a reversal of black and white, so illogical, and even a cheeky one, is unheard of and unseen! Let's look at this benevolent brother, Stoltenberg, we will feel very inexplicable when he says this, what did he say? Saying that I am NATO is not a problem that I can't get to Asia, but that China is approaching me! We see him in Africa, and we see him in the Arctic.
I think it's weird, NATO? What is NATO? What is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO? Theoretically, he is a military alliance, a defensive organization, and he is defending against the Soviet Union! This story is about like this, after the end of World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union were still allies, and then didn't this turn their faces? The United States wants to pull Europe, in fact, the United States and the Soviet Union are tantamount to saying that there is a tacit partnership to divide Europe into one half, the Soviet Union and the Eastern European bloc, as far as Eastern Europe and Central and Eastern Europe are under the sphere of influence of the Soviet Union, and Western Europe is the sphere of influence of the United States.
The United States had a very strong production capacity back then, and there was a surplus, and during World War II, he was full of firepower, that is, the production capacity of his entire factory was too large, and then this rich production capacity could be given to Europe to assist in the reconstruction of Europe. As for this European, he is still grateful. In addition, it is necessary to protect Europe militarily, which is why a North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO for short, has been established. First of all, the United States, he engaged in NATO, and it was like that Churchill, a British prime minister at that time, Churchill, ran to the United States and declared, the Cold War! The Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union has begun, from the world of the Baltic Sea to the Driste of the Adriatic! An iron curtain is slowly descending!
This Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, this Cold War provoked by the West, wasn't it all the first to engage in NATO? This NATO was led by the United States, that is, the countries of Western Europe, and then the Soviet Union set up a Warsaw Pact as a response. Before the collapse of the Soviet Union, one was the unification of Germany, the unification of East and West Germany. East Germany theoretically won by the Soviet Union, so if the Soviet Union did not nod its head, this reunification could not be completed, and the Soviet Union did not block it, and Germany was still grateful at that time, and gave the Soviet Union some benefits, so it gave money, thank you for not making trouble, not stopping it!
In addition, at that time, NATO promised Gorbachev about the leaders of the Soviet Union at that time that the merger of East and West Germany this time is not the same as NATO's eastward expansion, because East Germany is coming, then NATO's eastward expansion will be this time, and then NATO will not expand eastward by 1cm, which was said at the time! Then the Soviet Union also collapsed, and NATO expanded eastward five times. Some people say, then you can't come to NATO, then these countries have voluntarily joined NATO, and it can't be said that it is wrong, but this is only one side of a coin. On the other hand, what are these countries that can apply, and whether NATO agrees or not is it a matter of time? If NATO doesn't agree, this eastward expansion can't be realized, if NATO fulfills its commitments to Russia and the Soviet Union, he can't accept this application, the application over there is voluntary, you NATO agree, you agree, you break your previous promise, this is what you do, you can't see this!
Isn't this very simple, one vote can be vetoed? Finland and Sweden join NATO, and Turkey stands in the way, so won't Sweden get in? That's it, and Ukraine still wants to join NATO? Russia doesn't like it, so what's the use? Then do you dare to take NATO? Didn't you dare to continue? In fact, you have a choice, the key is that at the moment of the collapse of the Soviet Union, that is, the entire Soviet bloc will collapse, then Warsaw will be gone, and it stands to reason that there will be no need for NATO to exist?
No, not only there is, but it continues, and it is even more rampant, because there is no longer such a military bloc as the Soviet Union, such a military bloc as the Soviet Union. If you are enough to compete with you, if you have no power to suppress you, then you will do whatever you want, and then you will start suppressing Russia, not only that, but it will be in Europe after all, because the North Atlantic has long surpassed the imprative action that began on a global scale, including in the Asia-Pacific region, which is not called NATO. This is a global, expansive military organization, and this is a threat to many countries around the world, especially the major economies. And then the key is to say that NATO to the Asia-Pacific region is not a matter, the key is that China is approaching us, is it approaching us, isn't it a joke?
If you say that you have seen China in Africa, you have to ask whether Africans like you or not, whether they are happy with you, how old are you? What does it have to do with you? Why do you make irresponsible claims? Isn't that inexplicable? How dare you say that? I think this is really a taboo in the world, it is not logical to be logical, and it is unreasonable to be reasonable. Therefore, as far as China is concerned, we feel that it is very clear that we are seeking peaceful development and stability in the Asia-Pacific region. We do not accept or welcome any such organization to get involved in the development of the Asia-Pacific region, because for us, not only for us, but for the whole of Southeast Asia, the Asia-Pacific region, and the Indo-Pacific. It is war, chaos and confrontation, not peace, development and cooperation. Is our China already a threat to NATO security?