Alone or on the path of collectivization? Listen to the opinions and suggestions of professionals
For the sake of the future of the motherland and the nation, we must reform our land system!
Mr. Li Changping wrote a book entitled "Li Changping: For the country and the nation to have a future, we must reform the land system!" The title is: "For the motherland, for the nation!" He made it very clear that if there is no reform of the rural system, then there will be no future for this country, this country. He criticized the intellectuals at that time, saying that they had no sense of responsibility and mission, and only cared about their own selfishness, ignoring the future of the country and the country. He also said that in the past few decades, the education, medical and health care, housing renovation, land improvement and renovation, advocated by scholars, have not achieved good results. Secondly, he analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the two routes of land division and centralization, and believed that cooperation should be vigorously advocated.
I think there are many ways to consider this issue. Both field management and centralized management have their advantages and disadvantages, and cannot be simply compared. To a certain extent, the division of land is conducive to stimulating the production enthusiasm and creativity of peasant households, and is conducive to the efficient use of land resources. The collectivized highway has a strong scale effect, which can effectively integrate various resources and reduce the idleness and waste of land.
On the dialectic of the way of land division and collectivization.
Taking Xiaogang Village as an example, Li Changping expounded on the superiority of the rural collective management model. More than 20 years ago, Xiaogang Village started "cooperative management" from "field division" to "joint management", and achieved good economic results. However, Mr. Li Changping also pointed out that some scholars have selectively ignored this point and still believe that the division of land is the only way out of the rural problem.
On this issue, it is necessary to pay attention to the dialectical relationship between the two paths. Taking the road of cooperation has indeed played a great role in certain areas and at a certain stage, and has improved the economic development of the rural areas and the people's livelihood. However, the system of dividing land is also a reasonable and effective institutional arrangement. The individual contract management mode of land division has endowed farmers with greater autonomy and creativity, and promoted the development and reform of rural society.
The advantages and disadvantages of the road to land division and collectivization.
Mr. Li Changping expressed doubts about the practice of dividing the fields. He said that in the past few decades, the most that could have been divided was for farmers to plant a piece of land, but now they have to have a variety of plots to survive. This raises an important question: can the division of land ensure the sustainability of farmers?
Collectivized highways, on the other hand, have a larger area of cultivated land and higher returns. Cooperatives can concentrate rural resources, increase rural productivity, increase rural science and technology, increase rural income, and improve rural life. In addition, collectivization is also conducive to promoting the industrialization and modernization of China's rural areas.
However, we cannot completely deny the function and significance of the system of dividing fields. It is conducive to arousing the enthusiasm of peasant households to participate in agricultural production and fully arousing their enthusiasm for production and operation. The field division management method enables farmers to have a large space for autonomy, to adapt to the needs of the market, and to independently select and cultivate crops. It has also helped to increase the farmers' earnings and increase their creativity.
The author believes that the implementation of the two ways of land division and centralized management has its rationality and inevitability. Adapt to local conditions, adapt to local conditions, adapt to local conditions, adapt to local conditions, adapt to local conditions. Effective development of cultivated land is an effective way to improve the living conditions of the rural population and achieve sustainable national development.
The conclusion is that Li Changping, for example, resolutely supported the collectivization line and criticized the mode of land management. However, we should adhere to the dialectical viewpoint, understand the advantages and disadvantages of the two paths of separate land management and centralized management, and carry out rational farmland management according to local conditions. Only in this way can we better promote rural construction and improve the livelihood of peasants. After in-depth and rational development, a set of farmland management system in line with China's reality was finally obtained, and it will play a positive role in China's future development.