Some time ago, the so-called H-6K ultra-low-altitude raid on the US aircraft carrier, which scared the US aircraft carrier away, became popular all of a sudden, but in fact, there was no such thing at all, it was completely made up by a rhythmic marketing number. Recently, another 055 went out 100 nautical miles to single-handedly take on the US aircraft carrier? The U.S. F-18 carrier-based fighters have begun to dive maliciously, making bomb-dropping gestures, and so on, which is another kind of fabrication, deliberately deceiving traffic.
In fact, this time the 055 drive was only a radar sentry ship of the Liaoning ship formation, and it was not a heads-up at all, but a very ordinary forward alert. The actual situation at that time was that the Liaoning ship formation obtained satellite and other reconnaissance information, and learned that the Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group was nearby, so the Liaoning ship may have taken off an early warning*** At the same time, he wanted to send a destroyer 100 nautical miles away to conduct reconnaissance of radar sentry ships, or use electronic measurement systems to carry out these reconnaissance.
What is actually behind the whole incident? It is not a one-man attack, but it still relies on the wide-area maritime surveillance capability of our navy to have a higher-level command organ. For the 055 drive: it does not have such a large monitoring range, the 055 drive must rely on the Liaoning ship battle group to act, it is impossible for a single ship to attack the US aircraft carrier, a 055 drive can not deal with an aircraft carrier battle group, but to rely on the overall strength of the aircraft carrier formation.
The rapid development of our navy is certainly a matter that has attracted the attention of the world. Now we have three aircraft carriers, 50 guided missile destroyers and 120 missile frigates, and it is true that the number and tonnage are currently the second largest in the world, and these are also facts, but we must always maintain the necessary soberness.
In the final analysis, our navy is still a novice, and when you say that we are new, it actually has two meanings: one is that we have developed very rapidly in recent years, our equipment is new, and we make extensive use of new advanced technology.
On the other hand, what we call new, because after all, we are newly developed, and we still lack this kind of actual combat experience, and we are more jerky in this regard, especially how to use naval power, such as how to use the navy to play games with opponents in peacetime? For example, if the other side takes an unfriendly approach to provoke, what kind of means should we use to carry out such a confrontation? We also need to have a systematic approach to this, and this seemingly very intense scenario is bound to emerge in this confrontation.
For example, the carrier-based aircraft of the formation passing through the opposing side fly over their ships at low altitudes, carry out electronic electronic reconnaissance and electronic countermeasures, and so on, and conduct such simulated confrontations. These are actually a contest of your strength and will, and the other party will also use this means to deal with us, so objectively both sides may win and lose.
However, this kind of game and contest between the navies of the big countries has a bottom line, and this does not mean that tossing and turning here is a kind of temptation to touch each other's bottom line, the situation is still under control on the whole, and the struggle against a strong enemy on the vast ocean is a serious and dangerous matter, and we must seek truth from facts about the performance of our fleet, and it cannot be exaggerated too much, and if you continue to do this, it will only have a bad impact on ourselves.