Teacher exchange does not fundamentally solve the problem of educational equality, and the key lies with students, not teachers.
Teacher mobility does not fundamentally improve the quality of teaching; For better or worse, the key is not in the teacher, but in the student.
Our country has a school district system, and most schools are allocated according to regions, so that students can go to school better. However, such an admission method is also likely to result in a large difference in the number of students in a university.
In the case of our university, some of the best universities in the region are built around the most thriving communities. The location here is good, the houses are high, there is a higher quality of life and higher wages. Parents pay more attention to their children's education, and their children perform better in school. In this way, the improvement of education level can be promoted to a certain extent.
In fact, there is not much difference between good teachers and bad teachers, mainly in the whole country, teachers are carefully selected, most of them are college graduates, and many are from rural areas. This disparity is mainly reflected in the school spirit and the differences between teachers and students, and this disparity cannot be resolved even if the teachers take turns.
At present, many people overemphasize the role of the teacher, thinking that by going from a good teacher to a bad school, the education of a bad middle school can be improved, which is unrealistic. For example, if Tsinghua teachers are sent to rural schools, will they make all the children in the countryside become good students? Why is this happening? A good teacher and a good student are mutually beneficial, and without good classmates, there can be no good teacher. Many outstanding students, even if they meet an ordinary teacher, will not have much impact on them. If you're lucky, you'll be able to climb even higher.
As a result, the current teacher mobility mechanism does not work well. No wonder our teachers are not all real talents, and even if they do, there will be some students who are not capable.
Teacher mobility is a real problem and does not mean that moving elsewhere will solve the problem. If we fail to properly handle the practical problem of teacher rotation, it will inevitably have an adverse impact on future education work. For example, how to solve the problem of accommodation for changing teachers? Currently, many schools are not focusing on teachers' accommodation and accommodation. If I change schools, do I need to rent a house, and can the school subsidize it? Otherwise, teachers will be poorly paid. In addition, teacher shifts are also a big problem, some teachers have to come back every day, not every teacher will drive a car, so, how can you ensure that teachers go to work on time when the distance is so far? Especially in harsh weather conditions such as high winds, rain and snow, many teachers are girls, who will ensure their safety?
Most teachers choose their current workplace for convenience. However, with the implementation of the "double reduction", this situation has been broken, and the teacher is also in a dilemma: how to concentrate on reading? Under the new situation, how can we better improve the quality of education?
The causes of the uneven development of education in China's rural areas are very complex. For example, in a county-level city, there is a big difference in the level of education between rural and urban areas, let alone large cities. If we do not change the source of students and blindly pursue the improvement of the quality of primary education, the effectiveness of teacher exchange will only lead to the decline of good schools and the difficulty of promoting bad schools.
This post has been collected from the Internet and is not directed at any country, politics, group, race or individual. The information and theories reported in this article are provided by online information, and cannot prove the laws, regulations, opinions, practices and authenticity contained therein. The author does not assume any legal obligation for the information and other matters listed above, whether directly or indirectly.