Teacher rotation does not solve the problem of educational equity, the focus is on the source of students, not teachers!
Changing teachers does not solve the problem of equality in education; The quality of a school is not in the teachers, but in the students.
In order to make the children better enrolled, we have introduced a boarding school system. However, this way of enrolling also leads to differences among students.
In our region, for example, the best neighborhood schools are built around the most affluent neighborhoods. These communities are strategically located, with high housing prices and high quality residents, who are relatively affluent. They put more effort into their children's education, and their children's academic performance is better. This creates a virtuous circle in which the level of teaching in the school is gradually improved.
Teachers in good schools are not much different from those in poor schools, because the teachers they hire are rigorously selected, mostly university graduates, and some even come from rural areas. The difference is in the school ethos, the difference is in the gap between students, and this gap cannot be changed through teacher rotation.
Nowadays, many people exaggerate the role of famous teachers, believing that as long as special teachers are placed in subordinate schools, the teaching level of subordinate schools can be improved. Is this to let professors from Tsinghua University and Peking University go to rural primary schools, so that rural children can become top students? There is no such thing. Good teachers and good students are interdependent: without good students, even the best teachers are useless. And many excellent students, even if they find an average teacher, it will not have much effect. If you're lucky, it's even better.
This is why the current system of teacher rotation is not very effective. Unknowingly, our teachers are not all geniuses, and even if they are, there are some idiots.
Many of the practical issues associated with communicating with teachers are not a single sentence"Teacher mobility"slogans can be solved. If the practical problem of teacher mobility is not addressed, it will have a negative impact on future teaching and learning. For example, how to solve the problem of food and accommodation for on-the-job teachers? If I transfer to another school, do I have to rent a house, and will the school reimburse the expenses incurred? Otherwise, it will be a big burden for teachers who are not well paid. In addition, it is important to take into account the transportation of teachers on rotation: some teachers have to go home every day, not all teachers can drive themselves, and if the distance is long, how can teachers ensure that they get to work on time? In particular, many teachers had to travel in adverse weather conditions such as high winds, rain and snow.
Most teachers choose their current jobs primarily for convenience. However, the introduction of the teacher rotation system has broken this situation, and teachers no longer know what to do and how to concentrate on learning. In this case, how to improve the quality of teaching?
Equity in education cannot be achieved by changing teachers, and there are many reasons for this disparity. For example, in the same county, there is a large gap in the level of education between urban and rural areas, not to mention the gap between urban and rural areas. If there is no change in the source of students, the impact of changing teachers can only be that good schools are getting worse and bad schools are struggling!
Everything we do comes from the Internet, with no malicious or bad intentions. The information and theories are all from the Internet, and the content contained therein should not be considered as laws, regulations, opinions, actions, nor is it responsible for the authenticity of laws, regulations, opinions, actions, or the authenticity of the authors. The author of this article assumes no responsibility or liability, directly or indirectly, for the above or related matters.