February** Dynamic Incentive Program
Taking prefecture-level cities as an example, it is easiest to explain, for the convenience of description, although the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises have no level, the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises and the leading cadres at the department level are called leading cadres at the department level.
1. From the perspective of management, the leading cadres of municipal state-owned enterprises in prefecture-level cities, although there is no level! However, these state-owned enterprises are municipal enterprises, and the leading cadres at the principal and deputy positions of the enterprises are all municipal management cadres, just like the leading cadres at the department level.
2. Judging from the scope of management by leading cadres at the department level, leading cadres of state-owned enterprises can only manage the internal affairs of their own enterprises, and the scope is very narrow. The leading cadres at the department level are generally the heads of the constituent departments, no matter what the department is, they are responsible for a certain aspect of the city's work, and the scope of their jurisdiction is much wider than that of the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises!
3. Judging from the magnitude of the power of leading cadres at the department level, the power boundary of leading cadres of state-owned enterprises is only within the enterprise, and they can only manage the part of the work they are in charge of. As for the leading cadres at the department level, the boundary of power is in the content of the city's responsibility. The power exercised can affect a certain aspect of the city. The power is much greater than that of the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises.
4. From the perspective of its influence on the city's leading leadership, the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises at the department level have little influence on the city's leading leaders, and their influence is only limited to the relevant matters of the enterprise. The leading cadres at the department level have great suggestion and even decision-making power in their work, and the role of staff officers and decision-making cannot be underestimated, and their suggestions can directly affect the decision-making of the leadership in some aspects of work!
5. From the perspective of personal influence, leading cadres at the department level have different degrees of influence on departments, units and subordinate units in many aspects because of the power platform of their departments. The influence of the right to speak is much more powerful than that of the leading cadres of state-owned enterprises.
6. From the perspective of their status, although the leading cadres of municipal state-owned enterprises nominally belong to the same level as the leading cadres at the department level. It is also a municipal management cadre. However, in fact, the municipal state-owned enterprises are treated as subordinate units by the first departments at the same time, although it is a level. All in all, the leading cadres of municipal state-owned enterprises are far less powerful than the leading cadres at the municipal ** department level!
Welcome to follow @Institutional Research Hub.