Agricultural subsidies give rise to "disputes", and the rights and interests of contractors and growers are analyzed
The development of the rural economy has enabled the peasants to get great benefits, exempted from taxes and fees, and enabled them to fully enjoy their own land and their own harvest. However, due to the continuous development of China's agricultural system, some peasants have gone out to work to earn money, resulting in the idleness of some rural land. In order to mobilize the enthusiasm of farmers for food production, a food subsidy system has been introduced, and each household can enjoy a grain subsidy of more than 100 yuan according to the scale of land circulation. However, the subsidy has also brought controversy over which party should be given to the contractor and the grower.
For example, large farmers who lease their land to contract farmers, they pay rent, so some people feel that this subsidy should be paid to farmers. The peasants contracted their own land, paid the money, and deserved to receive the first subsidy. In addition, because large farmers have a deeper understanding of farmland and have a higher investment in farmland, they will also spend more energy and money on production.
However, it has also been suggested that the subsidy should be given to the villagers under contract. Although the land was leased to large farmers, the tenants made certain compromises, such as reducing the rent, which made it easier for the large grain growers to contract out their land. If the subsidy is distributed to the contracted farmers, it will be able to make up for the losses caused by the transfer of land. According to this view, subsidies should be returned to legal farmers, not contract farmers.
For this reason, some scholars have proposed that the ownership of subsidies should be defined in the contract transfer agreement. In this way, the matter of compensation can be written in the agreement, so that there will be no disputes in the future. This can not only protect the rights of the parties, but also effectively reduce the occurrence of disputes.
In short, the ownership of agricultural subsidies is an issue related to the balance of interests between farmers and farmers, and must be considered from multiple perspectives. Protecting the legitimate interests of peasants and clarifying the ownership of land ownership is the key to ensuring rural development.
Personal Summary. In short, there is a certain amount of controversy in the process of distributing agricultural products. In the new rural environment, there are reasonable aspects to the development and expansion of contract farmers. At the same time, farmers should also be given certain benefits to promote their effective use of cultivated land. At the same time, in order to protect the interests of rural households, subsidies should also be given to rural households. It is an effective method to determine the principles and methods of distribution of subsidized property.
But in practice, there must be a clear contract. In the contract, the ownership of the subsidy should be defined and supervision should be strengthened. In the process of signing the contract, the parties shall conduct comprehensive exchanges and consultations to protect the legitimate rights of the parties. It is necessary to establish a sound agricultural subsidy system to increase peasants' incomes, increase peasants' incomes, increase peasants' incomes, and increase peasants' incomes.
However, at present, in the practice of small-scale farmland transfer in China, there are problems such as non-standard contracts and difficulties in individual leasing. On this basis, a new idea of sustainable, sustainable and sustainable development is proposed. To this end, it is necessary to increase supervision and support for rural households, improve the system of farmland transfer, and strengthen training and guidance for rural households.
In the process of promoting rural revitalization, we should not only take into account economic interests, but also take into account the social benefits of agricultural production and people's living standards. In order to achieve full economic and social development in our country, it is necessary to establish a fair and just agricultural subsidy system. The author expects that, on this basis, through the research of relevant departments, a more scientific and reasonable allocation method of agricultural subsidy funds will be formulated.