Now there are fewer and fewer people writing about the Russian-Ukrainian war, and many people have stopped writing about it.
I'm getting less and less material for my articles, but even so, I'm still holding on, and I know a lot of friends want to read it.
If I didn't write, I felt like something was missing in my life.
Then let's work together and persevere, there are always some things in life that concern us, and the Russia-Ukraine war should be one of them.
Yesterday it was revealed that Russia has launched another large-scale missile attack on Ukraine, and this time the Ukrainian interception rate is surprisingly low.
Yesterday at noon, Zaluzhny reported the results of the interception: the Ukrainian air defense forces, intercepted all 8 Shahid drones, as well as 24 of the 18 KH555 cruise missiles. But:
All 4 Dagger air-launched ballistic missiles, all 22 KH22 supersonic cruise missiles, all 7 S300 anti-aircraft missiles, all 6 Iskander-M ballistic missiles, and two KH31P anti-radiation missiles were not intercepted.
This missile, which has not been intercepted, will cause great losses to Ukraine and will pose a huge threat to the lives and property of the Ukrainian people.
"Critical infrastructure, industrial, civilian and military facilities were attacked in a number of regions," the Ukrainian air defense forces said. The military administration will report on the consequences and the situation of victims on the ground. ”
This large-scale missile attack made me change my previous opinion.
I used to think that Russia's missile stocks had bottomed out, but now that I look at it, my previous opinion was wrong, it seems that Russian missiles have not yet been destocked, and there should be many missiles.
The question is, can ** supply so many missiles?Are there any other countries?
The reason for the surprisingly low interception rate this time is that there are two reasons:One is that Russia launches missiles, and more so towards remote locations, where Russia knows that Patriot defenses are not deployed.
The other is that Russia has changed its previous launch method to low-altitude or ultra-low-altitude launches.
It seems that in the next step, Ukraine still needs to have more missile defense systems, and then the Ukrainian Patriot missile defense system needs to change the way it responds and optimize its procedures.
During this period of time, there were two surprises, one was that the United States, which has always supported Ukraine, quarreled over $61 billion in aid to Ukraine, and finally the $61 billion aid has not been approved until now, and the second unexpected is that after Russia launched a large-scale attack on Ukraine this time, Ukraine's interception rate was so low.
I believe that in the next step, Ukraine will continue to launch large-scale missile attacks on Russia.
The best way to attack is to hit critical infrastructure such as oil depots and substations, and if you can paralyze Russian substations and other infrastructure, leaving Moscow in the dark, you can delay Russia's retaliation.
I've heard before that there is a bomb called a graphite bomb, which can have this effect, I don't know if Ukraine has considered it.
Graphite bombs were first used in 1991.
At that time, in order to deal with the United States, Iraq could be said to have mobilized the strength of the whole country, and made very adequate preparations for various wars, and once thought that it could perfectly defuse the American attack.
But what they did not expect was that the war had fallen into disadvantage from the very beginning. The root cause of this disadvantage comes from the graphite warheads dropped by the United States.
At that time, the United States sent dozens of F-117A fighters to carry out a large-scale bombing of Iraq. Iraq had already responded, after all, the top fighter at that time was already known to all countries in the world as the "best breakthrough" of the United States.
But what Iraq did not expect was that this round of bombing was not the world-famous Tomahawk missile, nor was it the most powerful explosive, but a warhead that had never appeared in war.
The bombardment of this graphite warhead instantly collapsed Iraq's power system, causing nearly ninety percent of Iraq's power supply facilities to collapse instantly.
As a result, Iraq could only fight the United States in the dark, and not only could it not use advanced positioning systems such as GPS, but even inter-ministerial communication became a problem.
As a result, this confident battle in Iraq, which lasted just over a month, ended in a landslide victory for the United States.
The United States can use this kind of missile against Iraq, and I wonder if Ukraine can follow the example of the United States, and then launch a similar attack on Russia to reduce its own losses and accelerate the victory of this war.
Modern society is inseparable from electricity, computers, communication facilities, etc., all need electricity to be able to operate. Once out of electricity, Russia cannot conduct operational command.
It is not possible to launch so many missiles at Ukraine.
In the face of the current war between Russia and Ukraine, many netizens have their own opinions, and some people think that it should be solved by war, because whether it is World War I or World War II, it is solved by war. In the world, war is often the only way to stop the war, but there are also people who hope to solve it through negotiations, believing that only negotiations can allow Ukraine to reduce its losses.
I think the Russian-Ukrainian war is not a simple war, but a struggle for order in the new century, a contest between justice and barbarism, and this war cannot be easily characterized as a Russian-Ukrainian war, it has a deeper content.
In this case, the war between Russia and Ukraine can only be resolved by means of war, so that Russia's arrogance can be defeated and the burning ambition can be extinguished.
Russia's ambitions are too great, saying that Ukraine threatens it, can the two countries compare and see that Ukraine threatens Russia?
Some netizens commented that Russia has a nuclear ** and its land area is so large, how can Ukraine threaten him?It's just an excuse for yourself.
Therefore, Ukraine must fight Russia to the end, and only in this way can it win a permanent peace.
The war between Ukraine and Russia, including the NATO and the European Union behind it, I feel a bit like the Qin State and the Six Kingdoms during the Warring States Period.
Those six countries are equivalent to the current NATO, and the Qin State at that time is equivalent to the current Russia.
It's still what Su Xun said"To do things with the land, for example, to put out the fire with salary, the salary is not exhausted, and the fire is not extinguished. "Meaning: How can you successfully put out a fire with firewood and grass?It can only make the fire bigger and bigger.
If Ukraine does not defeat Russia through war, but is content to negotiate with Russia to resolve territorial disputes.
After Russia tastes the sweetness, it will continue to occupy the territory of Ukraine after a while, and then Ukraine will cede territory again, and in the end there will be nothing.
According to Dugin, the "brain" of Vladimir Putin, Russia will expand into a country across the Eurasian continent in the future, which is the so-called neo-Eurasianism.
This proves that Russia's ambitions are great, and Ukraine will definitely not be able to satisfy his ambitions. Once Ukraine is annexed, the next step for Russia to move westward is the next step.
Looking back at the history of Russia,He has expanded more than 300 times in 100 years, either in expansion or on the way to expansion.
Therefore, it is impossible to satisfy Russia through land cession negotiations
Only by striking hard and knocking down Russia's arrogance
in order to stop Russia's ambitions and attempts to expand westward,
in order to defend the order of the world,
and to win this great patriotic war!