Why don't traditional oil vehicles popularize intelligence, especially intelligent driving? Actually, there is no need
Huawei's NCA services can be used nationwide, with a coverage rate of up to 99%.
Previously, Li Auto and Xpeng Motors also released upgrades to put NCA's functions into some areas.
In addition, in this "Dream Day", in addition to the release of "Xuanji architecture" and "full intelligence", BYD will also launch "NCA", "valet parking", "square parking", "vehicle unmanned" and other powerful functions.
Neither BMW nor Audi is equipped with Level 2 autonomous driving systems.
In the area of intelligent cabin intelligent driving, Mercedes-Benz can be said to be the best, the current Mercedes-Benz e, only has high-speed intelligent navigation, and there is no clear timetable for urban navigation, compared with other car companies, it is a lot worse.
New energy vehicles, mainly intelligent cabin intelligent driving, why not develop traditional fuel vehicles, or rather, there is no need for this at all.
First of all, most of the current new energy vehicles are pure electric vehicles and range extender vehicles, which do not require engines and rely on batteries to provide power, and the threshold for manufacturing a car is very low, similar to smartphones.
The smart machine is based on the chip as the core, the operating system as the core, and the intelligent cabin as the core.
The ideal car is equipped with refrigerators, TVs, and sofas, while the Wenjie is equipped with refrigerators, color TVs, sofas and other functions, and the intelligent cabin has stronger intelligent driving functions.
The traditional fuel vehicle is different, its engine, gearbox, and chassis are the core technologies, and those technologies are monopolized by major car companies, and they will not be the best at all, and there are obvious high and low.
For example, the greater the number of engines, the higher the level of technology, the stronger the efficiency, and of course, the higher the **; The 8 AT gearbox is better than the 7-speed one, and so on.
Moreover, fuel vehicles have been developed for more than 100 years and have long been clearly divided, while new energy vehicles have only appeared a few years ago, and most car companies are working hard to improve their technology.
To put it simply, the traditional fuel vehicles are still there, and the number is still there, while new energy vehicles do not have a fixed customer base, and there is no too high threshold, if you do not seize the time to develop, they will soon be eliminated.
Secondly, the intelligence of vehicles requires a large number of sensors, such as cameras and radars, which consume electricity all the time.
Traditional gasoline vehicles, at most 12 V, at most 48 V, because the capacity of the battery is too small, it is impossible to carry so many sensors for a long time, so most gasoline vehicles, do not have intelligence.
But fuel vehicles can do intelligent cabin intelligent driving, which can be seen from the Mercedes-Benz e, but most fuel vehicles can't do it, because the two are not at the same grade at all.
Many gasoline-fueled automakers are not good at software, and Volkswagen has invested a lot of money, but in the end it is still a mess; Although Huawei is strong in software, it has not made cars, just because this industry is too long.
Apple has been rumored to launch a new car, but in the end it failed because their hardware and software did not meet Apple's requirements.
Therefore, gasoline vehicles, that is, to do more, to make a few more, but there will be no shortage of markets, there must be intelligent products.
The brands of new forces are generally created by the founders of Internet companies, and their job is to make software, which is then produced by foundries.
What's more, most of the current new energy vehicles are plug-in hybrid or hybrid, and the proportion of pure electric is not high, and plug-in hybrid, hybrid, and hybrid are all driven by gasoline, so they are not worried about this.