Recently, the results of the 2023 election of valid candidates for academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering have attracted widespread attention.
The data shows that prestigious universities such as Peking University and Tsinghua University rank low in the election rate of academician candidates, while Hong Kong Chinese University and Zhengzhou University have achieved a 100% election rate.
What is the hidden law behind this phenomenon?
In the election of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Peking University and Tsinghua University ranked first and third from the bottom, respectively, while the Chinese University of Hong Kong reached 100%.
In the election of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, Tsinghua University and Harbin Institute of Technology also performed relatively sluggishly, while 15 universities, including Beijing Normal University and Xiamen University, had a 100% election rate.
From the data analysis, there are many valid candidates for academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in famous science universities, but there are not many elected candidates.
A similar situation exists in the election of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, a prestigious engineering school.
This may be due to the fact that science universities have a higher rate of being elected as academicians of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and are less willing to apply.
In the election of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the competition has become more fierce due to the large number of valid candidates from prestigious science schools, resulting in a low election rate.
On the contrary, the election rate of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Engineering is higher for non-prestigious universities, which may be due to the low willingness to apply.
The different degrees of influence of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering on the election results of valid candidates for academicians in different universities are also one of the reasons for the differences in the election rates of different universities.
The most striking phenomenon is that the university election rate of one valid candidate and one winner is 100%.
This can be influenced by a number of factors, including willingness to file, discipline strength, and more.
To sum up, the results of the election of academicians of Chinese universities present some interesting phenomena that deserve further in-depth study and **.
It is hoped that future elections will be more fair and just, so that more outstanding scientists and engineers can show their talents.